Search This Blog

Monday, 26 October 2015

White Tax

In the last few months we have been hearing  about the so-called "black tax" on black graduates. 

For those of you who do not care to read that: They have been talking about how the poor little black children, after receiving their degrees are forced to use their paychecks to start supporting their parents and siblings and more remote family members meaning that they have to fight harder than everyone else to get out of poverty. And naturally the businesses are so deeply racist the poor little delicate flowers have to actually *gasp* WORK hard after graduating to work their way up the ladder instead of getting given the top job, millions in salaries and the corner office with authority over all of the other employees right off the bat...

This would all be so sad if it were not for the following reasons:
1. No one forces their parents to have between 5 and 10 children while they are living in shacks and know that they cannot afford to feed, clothe and educate them.

2. Education has been made free at many, many schools but they refuse to send their kids to the no fee schools that their beloved ANC (whom they voted for) have created because the education is substandard and ultimately useless. They instead insist on sending their kids to fee paying schools (where they refuse to pay fees which are then subsidized by the paying parents - see the discussion below).

3. Instead of finding holiday jobs and jobs after hours in order to get the experience they need in their chosen fields these "students" would rather go out and party or go home and do nothing.

4. After 21 years of BEE, AA and EE they are still not able to help themselves. They get first choice at jobs despite the fact that they are, more often than not, not qualified for and yet they STILL cannot make their own lives better.

5. No one forces these kids to drop out of school (especially no fee schools) when they cannot cope because the system simply forces them through regardless of ability. As a result these kids simply become criminals because they don't want to actually have to work for something. Now you get a whole lot of them simply stealing what others have worked hard for and not contributing to the economy.

6. They voted for the crop of corrupt criminals that have made it almost impossible for the economy to grow in the following ways:

a. They have allowed the trade unions to hold companies to ransom thus decreasing growth and discouraging foreign investment and new start-ups;

b The labour laws are so oppressive that people refuse to hire more people due to the risks and inflexibility of getting rid of useless staff members;

c. BEE forces companies to stop growing beyond a certain point for fear that they will have to give part of their companies away for little or no consideration after they have grown them or face huge fines for non-compliance.

d. Continual protests and violence  makes investors uneasy and we see a weakening rand and rising inflation as a result.

So I have very little sympathy for this so-called "black tax" as they have brought it on themselves by being unable or unwilling to change their ways and let go of archaic practices.

But now lets talk about the white tax that I am sick of as well. You see, white people (and many black middle class) are being unduly prejudiced by the voting proletariat and their criminal offspring who insist on voting for terrorists. What is this "white tax" I refer to? Lets create a list and explore it:

1. Whites are forced to barricade themselves in their own homes at great personal cost. For fear of crime and violence we are spending tens of thousands of rands on security for our homes. This includes creating veritable prisons behind high walls to keep the criminals out. Our quality of life is being systematically reduced because of the fear of losing our hard earned possessions and even our lives.

2. Whites are paying huge insurance premiums every month to protect their investments. We pay high car insurance costs because we cannot afford to replace or repair our vehicles when they are damaged or destroyed by careless individuals who don't give a flying fig about the rules of the road (taxi drivers and pedestrians I'm looking at you).

We pay ever increasing household content insurance premiums in case our prisons are not fortified enough and we have to replace what the affirmative shoppers have appropriated - often violently.

3. We pay exorbitant medical aid premiums because we cannot use the useless public hospitals where whites are often mistreated and ignored and sometimes even further violated by the black employees whose salaries we pay through our tax money.

4. We pay ever increasing private school fees to find a modicum of decent education for our children because the public education is ultimately useless.

5. We pay increasing electricity rates to subsidise the black areas who refuse to pay and who violently protest when the consequences of non-payment are visited upon them.

6 Whites are forced to pay higher and higher property rates and water levies for the same reasons.7. Whites are forced to have fewer or no children at all because we cannot afford them. We are therefore subsidizing the ever increasing number of poor black people who refuse to use a condom.

7. We are forced to pay indecently large portions of our salaries in income tax to fund the social grants for the people who refuse to stop having children and then abandon them and then strike. We have to pay for our overcrowded prisons and for increasing government corruption and incompetence.

8. We are forced to prevent growth of our legacies because if we do not we may  be forced to give away large portions of it to blacks who had no hand in the creation or growth of those legacies or face hefty fines.

9. We have to contend with being subject to mistrust for police because they too engage in the African pastime of crime and often with a view to targeting whites.

10. We cannot benefit from charity or social programs and are penalised for helping other whites. We are systematically excluded form the job market almost entirely unless we start our own businesses wherein we are again prejudiced by the racist BEE laws.

11. We live in fear of having our property taken away from us for the purposes of "redistribution" simply because one black man can say he wants it and is entitled to it. 

12. Every time there is a screw up or something goes wrong or someone just wants to get their hands on something they didn't create whites are made the scapegoats and Apartheid is trotted out as the the reason and whites branded as evil racists and therefore treated as less than nothing.

There are many more ways that whites are forced to pay "white tax" in South Africa and I for one am sick of it.
It is time that white tax falls and time that whites all stood together to demand it. I don't know about you but I am tired of triple checking all of the locks on the doors and windows every night before I go to sleep and every time I leave my home. I am tired of having to think twice before going somewhere because I am scared that I could be robbed or raped or murdered. I am tired of having to fund the exponential growth of the black population while they add nothing to the economy and I am tired of being told that I am a racist when I point all of this out.

Monday, 5 October 2015

Jewish Lives Don't Matter

Seeing as News24 has gone completely coward in their latest reform by not allowing comments so that they can say what they like without having to endure opposing views and actual fact from readers I think that I have a duty to repost this little gem from Howard Feldman...

Jewish Lives Don’t Matter

Howard Feldman

On Saturday evening, a family of Jews on their way to prayer in Jerusalem were attacked by a Palestinian man. The young parents and their baby were stabbed. The father died, as did a passer by who kindly rushed to assist. The mother was badly injured and the child’s life forever altered. BBC World picked up on the story and reported as follows; “ Palestinian shot dead after Jerusalem attack kills two.” The headline was later changed, twice in fact, but the immediate message was clear. Jewish lives don’t matter.

A few weeks ago a photo went viral. It depicted a scene where an Israeli soldier, who was being attacked by stone throwing youths, pulled a Palestinian child. Pulled him. Didn’t stab him. Didn’t shoot him. Didn’t behead him, as seems to be a preferred discipline in the neighborhood. He pulled him. And the world gasped in horror. The “Brutality” of the soldier was splashed across the pages of global media, and only later when it transpired that the whole event was staged managed by a family who had repeatedly set themselves up to be in the public eye, did the story cool. Contrast that with the non-existent reaction to Saturday’s family murder.

Contrast that with the murder of two parents on Thursday night as they drove home with their four children in the car. Shot to death in front of their children because they were Jewish and had the audacity to live in Israel. Most South African news outlets ignored the story, because sadly, Jewish lives don’t seem to matter.

Benjamin Netanyahu in his address to the United Nations General Assembly raised the issue of global silence. He questioned how when 70 years after the holocaust Iran publicly and repeatedly threatens to wipe out the Jewish State the world could once again remain silent. He stared down the member states in a 45 seconds silent protest emphasizing his distaste. Iran has publicly and repeatedly threatened to annihilate the Jewish State and its people. It has funded terror in the region and fought a proxy war against the country. And the United Nation has remained silent. Even her so called allies failed her and have pressed on with an agreement that will allow millions of dollars to flow into the country and enable them to continue along their stated path.

Hamas and the Palestinian Authorities have welcomed the slaughter of the families. The have rejoiced in the streets and have publicly lauded the murderers as heroes. They have cowardly hidden behind the fabricated tension on the Temple Mount where it is only Muslims and not Jews who are allowed to pray. It is the second oldest trick in the book –accuse someone of the very act that you are guilty of. It confuses and it subverts and somehow in the topsy-turvy world of the Middle East, where the most bigoted and racists have managed to win the hearts of the liberal global press, this technique works magically.

The sad truth is that in many parts of the Middle East, Christian lives don’t seem to matter much either. Nor do gay people’s lives and nor do the lives of women, children and anyone who ventures a view outside that of the ruling authority. We have seen repeated abuse and slaughter of anyone who challenges, and the world has largely remained silent. It’s a shame and it’s a disgrace. And the press shares the responsibility by being complicit in the deception.

I hated the 45 seconds of silence in Netanyahu’s UN speech. Partly because silence makes me uncomfortable. And partly because he turned Jewish guilt on the world and I have always considered that to be our cross to bear. But it said more than any words could have.

Because, to date words have failed us.

Because words have been used against us.

And because words have distorted the truth.

And words have killed.

The tragic deaths of the families in Israel indeed leave us speechless. Bereft and heartbroken. We have no words of comfort for the children who will grow up without parents and who will always be aware that there were those who danced in the streets on hearing of their loss. And we have no words for the parents who had to find the vocabulary to eulogize their children. But we can keep a close eye on the custodians of our news and those who frame our perceptions. The power of the headline is immense. If the media choose not to monitor themselves, then that grave responsibility falls on us.

Awww Shame...

Looks like I'm getting some hate mail guys... now I know that I'm doing something right... And its not like they can even come up with a coherent argument in mitigation of their own savage tendencies... and to ask for a post that does not involve swearing? Why not ask for the sun and stars instead - it will be easier to obtain.

For your viewing pleasure - the comment I received on my post "Fuck Yeah Dead White People":

I see someone is a little mad that the black hypocrisy is being pointed out and the savages advocating it are being called out... shown to the world to be a racist hatemonger... and yet a coward as well.

I wonder how long this guy has been out of jail and when his next stint will be?? Should also be noted that it comes from a black dude that has never set foot on the African continent and would probably be one of the "refugees" trying to get back into the horrid racist filled white countries if he ever did...

Tuesday, 22 September 2015

Slippery Slope Fallacy Anyone?

When conservatives said that accepting homosexuality would lead to other, more harmful "sexual orientations" and demands outside of the prevailing moral framework the left derided us as bigots, haters and espousing a logical fallacy.

I wonder if they will now see just how easy it is becoming for that slippery slope argument to completely take center stage a proven 100% correct now that we have mainstream news and opinion outlets aimed at the left trying to show pedophilia as a completely normal sexual orientation rather than the despicable, sick and unnatural mindset it really is? has recently posted an article by a self-professed pedophile who is telling us just how "natural" his state of affairs is and how we shouldn't judge him because he is a "good guy" just because he has not yet indulged in criminal behaviour with a child. This guy seems to have missed the whole point - he's more worried about how people will judge him for his unnatural desires than the fact that he is a very real and potential danger to each and every child he comes into contact with.

We should now all feel so sorry for the guy who would like screw children because people don;t accept him for who he is... and we should just accept him and his desires. And come on... we should all be allowed to love and do as we please right? Everyone is equal and this poor little snowflake deserves to be accepted by everyone and if you don't accept him you are an evil evil person.

How long before there is a massive drive to accept pedophilia in mainstream and to abolish all laws calling it a crime? How long then will it be before we see demands being made for marriage between a child and an adult? And then how long will it be before we are asked to accept other taboo sexual practices?

I don;t know about you, but for me its quite simple - people like this are ill and need intense therapy and possibly to be medicated. How many liberals who will be demanding that he be treated equally and that the law and people stop discriminating against him on the basis of his legitimate "sexual orientation" would be willing to leave their young children alone in his care? But you can bet that they will all eventually be campaigning for the rest of us to allow these people to teach in our schools and be involved with children on a daily basis - you can't discriminate on them for any reason now can you?

And then what do we blame when one or many of those children are abused or molested just because he could no longer control himself? We need to start making a concerted effort to turn things around back in the direction of good old-fashioned morals where those who do not conform to those morals that  make sure we live in a safe society as free as possible of these ills where they are actively condemned and where our children learn right from wrong. 

Call me what you must... but people like this need to be removed from society and given the very real mental help that they need.

The article below seems to actually be an advert for a website dedicated to a bunch of sick individuals strangely called "virtuous pedophiles" (I will not link to the website because the last thing I would want is to help get a whole bunch of potential kiddy fiddlers together all in one place - even if they say that they don't want to act on their desires). 

Read the whole article here.

I’m a pedophile, but not a monster

MONDAY, SEP 21, 2015 07:35 PM SAST

I'm attracted to children but unwilling to act on it. Before judging me harshly, would you be willing to listen?

I was born without my right hand. As a child, this deformity quickly set me apart from my peers. In public I wore a prosthesis, an intimidating object to other youngsters because of its resemblance to a pirate’s hook.  Even so, I wore it every day; I felt inadequate without it. I was shy, uncoordinated and terrible at sports, all of which put me on the outs with other boys my age. But I was good at drawing and making up stories for my own entertainment, and I spent more and more time in my own head, being a space adventurer or monster wrangler or whatever character I could think up. These would ultimately prove to be useful skills, but for now they only served to further alienate me from other kids.  On top of it all, I still struggled with bladder control—likely due to my heaping pile of insecurities, to which this problem only added more—well into my elementary school years.  
But none of this would compare to the final insult the universe would deal me.  I’ve been stuck with the most unfortunate of sexual orientations, a preference for a group of people who are legally, morally and psychologically unable to reciprocate my feelings and desires.  It’s a curse of the first order, a completely unworkable sexuality, and it’s mine.  Who am I?  Nice to meet you.  My name is Todd Nickerson, and I’m a pedophile.  Does that surprise you?  Yeah, not many of us are willing to share our story, for good reason.  To confess a sexual attraction to children is to lay claim to the most reviled status on the planet, one that effectively ends any chance you have of living a normal life.  Yet, I’m not the monster you think me to be.  I’ve never touched a child sexually in my life and never will, nor do I use child pornography.  
But isn’t that the definition of a pedophile, you may ask, someone who molests kids?  Not really.  Although “pedophile” and “child molester” have often been used interchangeably in the media, and there is some overlap, at base, a pedophile is someone who’s sexually attracted to children. That’s it. There’s no inherent reason he must act on those desires with real children. Some pedophiles certainly do, but many of us don’t. Because the powerful taboo keeps us in hiding, it’s impossible to know how many non-offending pedophiles are out there, but signs indicate there are a lot of us, and too often we suffer in silence.  That’s why I decided to speak up.
The Discovery of an Alternate Sexuality:
Many gays begin to recognize their sexual preferences sometime around puberty, if not before.  For me it was the same.  I was about 12 when the first inklings of a sexual preference bubbled up in me, though at the time I thought little of it.  As I turned 13 it occurred to me that what I initially took as a phase had begun to solidify into something more troubling.  Even so, at this point I could still convince myself that I was within the realm of normalcy.  Then something happened that all but removed my ability to continue this self-denial: my Eureka Moment.  
One day, as I was sketching in my grandparents’ living room, a neighbor of theirs came to visit with his seven-year-old daughter in tow.  At first I hadn’t noticed her because she was quiet.  I only heard my grandpa and his neighbor chatting in the kitchen while I sketched.  Soon the little girl walked into the dining room and stood at the archway entrance to the living room, watching me draw.  I can still see her today in my mind’s eye: dressed in blue jeans and a nearly matching denim jacket, with pristine blue eyes and a halo of wispy blond curls framing her face.  She seemed somehow larger than life and almost ancient in the way she stood so perfectly still.  Then, just like that, she was gone; she and her father left.  That singular moment, though it could scarcely have lasted more than a few minutes, has become seared into my memory.
He Touched Me:
So how had this happened?  Well, I have a pretty good idea.  When I was seven years old, I was fondled in the front yard of my grandparents’ home by a man I barely knew.  It was a one-time event in my life and not a particularly traumatic one.  A man I’ll call Hans, a German who was acquainted with my uncle and aunt from when they lived in Nuremberg, had come to visit America.  He spent a day and a night at their place, and they lived next door to my family along with my grandparents, who shared their two-story brick house.  That day, the man lingered in the house with my grandma, who was stuck with him while everyone else had gone to work, and as neither could speak the other’s language, it quickly became uncomfortable for both.  
Grammy’s solution was to send Hans outside with one of the grandkids.  As I happened to be in the room at the time, I was assigned the task.  “Take him out and show him Papa’s garden,” she told me.  “Tell him the names of the vegetables.  He’d probably enjoy that.”  I agreed.  Besides, even though I knew not a whit of German, I was very much at ease in Hans’s presence.  He was painfully thin, with a messy mop of hair and large glasses.  I should point out that the men in my life, including my father, were gruff blue-collar types who could intimidate me.  Hans was different: gentle, soft-spoken and appealingly awkward—a lot like me!  
I took the man’s right hand with my left (my good hand) and led him out into the garden, which took up most of the front lawn at my grandparents’ place.  I escorted my new friend down the rows of veggies, calling out each one as we passed it, and Hans would gleefully parrot the names.  This went on until we made our way through the entire garden.  I was proud to find myself educating an adult rather than the other way around.  When the English lesson was over, Hans plopped himself down on a patch of earth near the garden and patted the spot next to him, indicating he wanted me to sit there.  I did.  I couldn’t believe this peculiar man I barely knew was so eager to connect with me, the weird little kid nobody liked.  It felt good.
For long minutes we simply enjoyed each other’s company.  Then, out of the blue, Hans slipped a hand into my shorts, even though we were only about 30 feet from the poorly paved country road that meandered through this stretch of country.  This went on for several minutes.  I was confused but not frightened or troubled.  The only thing I could think to say while this was happening was “Peepee,” continuing the English lesson with my pet name for my genitalia even in the midst of my own abuse.  Hans chortled and repeated the word: “Peepee.”  Eventually this came to an end, and Hans, having gotten what he wanted, shooed me away.  I can’t imagine why it didn’t occur to him that I would immediately rat him out; maybe he knew and just didn’t care.  Anyway, he could hardly ask me not to, could he?  I raced back to Grammy and promptly informed her of what had happened.  She deliberated over what to do, in the end asking me to keep it a secret from everyone, including my parents, and ordering me to stay away from Hans.  No authorities were called, and life went on as usual.  Hans stayed that evening with my uncle and aunt and left the next day.  I never saw him again.
Ultimate Causes:
It’s easy to assume that pedophilia is always the result of some early sexualization or abuse, and certainly there seems to be a connection in some cases.  However, evidence suggests there’s no magic bullet that pedophilia can be traced back to.  For every pedophile who was sexually abused as a child there’s another who wasn’t.  Likewise, most abuse victims never manifest pedophilic desires.  Some researchers surmise that pedophilia can be traced back to genetics.  Others believe the cause is congenital, and still others that it’s environmental.  Personally, I think the ultimate cause is likely some combination of those, and that it varies from person to person.  
Another issue is the role feelings of inadequacy play in forming our sexuality.  Pedophilia may not arise from such fears (otherwise there’d be a lot more pedophiles), but those fears can certainly reinforce it.  I think it’s safe to say that many pedophiles have deep-seated feelings of inferiority in one way or another, or at least we did when our sexuality was forming, and this becomes a downward spiral during puberty and beyond.  Anything can be the trigger of this: disabilities, weight issues, or just general feelings of unattractiveness to peers.  These feelings can be influential on one’s developing sexuality, such that even the severe cultural taboo is not enough to override it.  Indeed, the taboo itself can negatively influence these vulnerable children.
I recall an event from when I was 11, sitting in the family jeep with my dad and his friend Andy when a news piece on the radio reported the sexual abuse of a girl, to which my dad said to his friend something like, “They should take people like that and place weights on top of their genitals until they smash.”  Pretty horrific imagery for an 11-year-old to process, and I couldn’t help but sympathize with the abuser.  After all, I could recall my own molestation perfectly, and I hardly felt it warranted that kind of response.    
The bile has only multiplied since then, and I believe all that hatred just serves to reinforce pedophilia in youngsters predisposed to it.  It’s a form of cognitive bias called the Backfire Effect or polarization.  Everyone does this to some extent.  When challenged on deeply held beliefs, no matter how uncertain or incorrect they may be, we tend to dig in our heels.  With sexuality, that effect is likely magnified because there’s a physiological component, a drive every bit as powerful as belief.  In essence, your brain knows what it likes and isn’t going to take no for an answer.  For that reason, the nature or nurture question with respect to sexual preference is ultimately irrelevant—it becomes all but hardwired soon enough, until it’s all you know.  And it’s self-reinforcing, no matter how much you wish to dig it out.  Eventually it all tangles together with the rest of who you are.  
Getting Schooled:
Things went along OK until I was two years away from graduating college.  I began to smoke pot, a drug I’d experimented with after high school but didn’t much care for then.  I didn’t like it the second time around either; it made me anxious more often than not.  But I did it anyway, largely because many people I respected smoked it, and I wanted to be more like them.  I was trying desperately to reshape my identity before I was thrown out into the real world.  I’d even begun working out, lifting weights and exercising to get in better shape.  On the outside I might’ve seemed pretty normal, but on the inside I was screaming in terror at the prospect of having to “grow up” and be “normal”—which to me meant getting a real job, finding a girlfriend, eventually getting married and raising a family.  Oh, I wanted to be normal, believe me, yet I knew myself well enough to know I wouldn’t be able to carry that charade off for long, and every fiber of my being resisted the forced transformation.
After graduation I fell into the deepest pit of despair imaginable, one that lasted several years, and I’ve only just begun to pull myself out of it.  You can’t experience that much blind terror and pain for that long without being seriously impacted by it.  I still worked out every other day, so I was hurting constantly, since depression saps your brain of the feel-good chemicals that helps to counteract pain; but I feltsomething, and that was better than the emotional numbness that had overtaken me.  Thus, my project to remake myself into a regular person a complete failure, I retreated inward like a kicked dog, often spending days on end in my bedroom.  At the nadir of my depression I was contemplating suicide daily; some days I could think of little else.  I found some relief in opiates, which I had to obtain illegally because doctors won’t prescribe them for depression and anxiety.  The occasional hydrocodone gave me a moment of respite from the agony I was going through.  I’d tried antidepressants, but they were a joke.  
In the midst of that dark era in my life, I discovered an unhealthy pedophile forum.  Nothing illegal was happening there, but many of its most influential members were pro-contacters, meaning they believed that sex with children was theoretically OK and supported the elimination of age of consent laws.  That forum still exists and I won’t name it here, but suffice it to say, I found myself taking up the same pro-contacter chants, if only to feel like I belonged somewhere.  At the time it was all that was available in terms of an actual pedophile community, and I had nothing left to lose by joining the cause, misguided though it was, and even decided to out myself on that forum.  Over the ensuing years, though, I was often at odds with the pro-contacters and flitted in and out of their clique; I wanted desperately to be friends with people who shared my sexual orientation, even if they held crazy beliefs, but I could never quite reconcile with their viewpoint.  
Not long after I self-outed, a group of web vigilantes called Perverted Justice showed up.  You’ve probably heard of them; they’re the people behind the now-defunct TV show “To Catch a Predator.”  I was no predator, but that mattered not one iota to these guys; they lumped me together with the child rapists and internet creeps just the same.  As I was already out of the closet as a pedo, I was an easy target, becoming one of the first people they profiled on their Wikisposure page, a site devoted to outing online pedos whether they’d broken any laws or not.  It has since changed hands but still exists online, buried in a dark corner of the internet, and yep, I’m still on it.  Not that I much care anymore.  Perverted Justice had their day, but they eventually burned their own house down.  Back when they were in full effect, however, they managed to make my already miserable existence that much more miserable. After their expose came out, I was fired from my job at Lowe’s.
But things are getting better.  Slowly.  These days I struggle with bitterness and apathy; it’s a constant uphill battle, and there are days I just don’t feel like making that climb.  I eke out a living (barely) on a freelance graphic design business, in a small town where too many people know who and what I am.  Now I have a bachelor’s degree in journalism that I’ve never used and I’m living well below the poverty line, existing on food stamps and the couple hundred dollars I manage to scrape together every month, sometimes augmented with financial help from my parents if the bills get too high.  I tried filing for disability over my arm and my emotional issues, but that was a no-go in my conservative Southern state.  This is what a law-abiding pedophile has been reduced to in this society.  At times I’ve wondered why I’ve even bothered to stay legal.  Maybe prison would be better, even at the risk of getting shanked as a Short Eyes.  At least then it would all be over with.  But alas, I could never hurt a child.  No matter what, some small part of me still holds out hope that things will go back to normal, or as close to normal as a celibate pedophile with little prospect of a future can get.  Besides, like I said earlier, I just couldn’t allow myself to foist this abomination onto another human being.  So I simply endured. Until …  
I was still caught up in the same nonsense at the pro-contacter forum last year when Ethan Edwards started posting at the forum.  Actually he’d been there for a while.  I didn’t take much notice of him at first, but when I realized he was the constant target of the pro-contacters’ attacks, I sympathized with him and began to pay closer attention to his posts, realizing that he was an anti-contacter like me.  He was there to win over people who were either on the fence about the contact issue or didn’t agree with the pro-contacters’ position but had nowhere else to go to talk about their sexuality.  Until now.  Ethan and his friend Nick Devin founded Virtuous Pedophiles on the notion that pedos needed an alternative to those other forums, a place where they can feel comfortable and get the support they need without the pressure to support sketchy views about adult-child sex.          
I really can’t praise this organization enough.  It’s been a lifesaver for me.  I still get depressed and anxious sometimes, but I’m improving.  I feel better about myself and a little more hopeful about my future these days.  I have other pedophiles in my life that I’m actually proud to call friends, people I would trust my children with if I had any, knowing they’d be safe there.  Many, like Ethan, have raised families of their own, or are still doing so.  A large number of them are quite young.  Despite the prevailing stereotype of the dirty old man, the average age of posters at VP hovers around mid-twenties.  I’m so glad that younger folks are flocking to Virtuous Pedophiles, where they can get the coaching and support that was not available to us older pedos at their age.  It’ll make all the difference as they settle into themselves and learn to accept who they are.   
VirPed itself has become the go-to place for support for non-offending pedophiles and has been mentioned and endorsed everywhere from NPR, Salon and the Atlantic to the New York Times and Toronto Star.  As its popularity increases, so too does its effectiveness.  There are still holdouts, people who believe that pedophilic feelings should be crammed down into the most subterranean recesses of ourselves, never to be discussed in the open, but these folks are going the way of the dodo bird.  Anyway, we’ve tried that.  Take it from someone who has firsthand experience: it not only doesn’t work, it tends to make things far worse.  Please repeat this mantra to yourself: a repressed, unhappy pedophile is a pedophile at risk.             
Those individuals who have the courage to come forward and lay claim to this affliction with the understanding that they only want to use their pedo powers for good should be commended, not hated and feared.  You can’t imagine how difficult it is to tell people you’re a pedophile, even a non-offending one, and even if those people are other pedos.  Truly, the very concept of a pedophile who neither molests nor wants to molest children is often anathema to people’s way of thinking.  The long-held belief that pedophiles are destined to abuse kids is a tough one to overcome, yet many of us get just as upset as—if not more upset than—non-pedophiles when we read accounts of sexual abuse, not only because we hate when one of the little people we love most suffers, but also because, whenever yet another pedophile is arrested, it reinforces the reigning paradigm of the pedo as ticking time bomb.
For better or worse—mostly worse—we have this sexuality, and unlike with most sexualities, there is no ethical way we can fully actualize our sexual longings.  Our desires and feelings, if we are to remain upright, are doomed from the outset.  Indeed, whereas the majority of crimes can be bounced back from, society doesn’t extend a mulligan to molesters.  I understand why, but that doesn’t make the burden any lighter to bear, particularly for those of us who have minimal or no attraction to adults.  And for the pedos who are lucky enough to be able to form working relationships with adults, there are a new set of concerns: What if we have children?  Will I be a threat to them?  Can I ever share this fact with my spouse?  Can I ever love and want her as much as I do a child?  
So, please, be understanding and supportive.  It’s really all we ask of you.  Treat us like people with a massive handicap we must overcome, not as a monster.  If we are going to make it in the world without offending, we need your help.  Listening to me was a start.

Wednesday, 22 July 2015

Dear Cis People...

The Question:

The Answer:
The fact that all of you people keep insisting that the world accept you for who you are and not judge you and love you and think that your choices are appropriate and not depraved and/or insane. 

Thursday, 9 July 2015

Teach Men not to Rape

Today I must admit that I lost my temper. And what made me lose my temper you ask? This did:

A small Facebook post. One that on the face of it has a great message behind it. But when you read it again you get to see that it is the embodiment of the sexist feminist rhetoric.

I am sick and tired of men and only men being branded as rapists. And I am equally sick and tired of women being told that they do not have to take responsibility for their own safety and actions. 

Do I condone rape? Not at all.
Do I blame the victim? No.
Do I think women should have no responsibility? No.

Why is it that these people think that a woman should have all of the freedoms in the world but have no responsibilities? Why should a woman be able to come and go as she pleases and act as she pleases in any places she she chooses and not have any responsibility? 

I know they have been said before but saying that women should not have any responsibility in protecting themselves is the same as:

1. Telling people to stop stealing instead of telling me to make sure my property is protected;
2. Telling cars not to hit people instead of telling people to look both ways before crossing the road;
3. Telling children to behave instead of telling parents to discipline their children;
4. Telling people not to get fat instead of eating healthily and exercising;
5. Telling people not to murder instead of telling me to make sure my person is protected;
6. Telling people not to get pregnant instead of telling them to use contraceptives;
7. Telling people not to have a hangover instead of telling them not to drink too much;
8. Telling water not to drown people instead of teaching people how to swim...

I'm sure you can think of quite a few to add... don;t be shy in the comments.

I am seriously getting sick and tired of the no responsibility brigade parading around in their feminist colours. I am sick and tired of being told that I am weak and cannot and should not protect myself. That I have to depend on others to fight for me by making me more of a victim. 

I for one will be teaching all of my children that:

1. Rape is wrong - perpetrating it or accusing someone of it without reason; and
2. How to protect themselves from any and all possible situations to the best of my and their ability. 

All of us have the responsibility to look after ourselves and take steps to make sure we are not harmed in any way... why should women be exempted from being responsible for their own safety.

But here is the real kicker that people who would post this message again and again don;t seem to get:

Rape is a crime in almost every single country. 
A conviction for rape usually carries a hefty prison sentence.
After being convicted (or even just accused) of rape a man will forever be treated like a rapist and will be shunned.
Rape is in no way condoned and this is taught from an early age.

And as a final thought - maybe feminists should actually look at the legal definition of the crime of rape to get a better idea of what rape is and what rape is not. ie:

Rape IS the penetration, no matter how slight, of the vagina or anus with any body part or object, or oral penetration by a sex organ of another person, without the consent of the victim.

Rape is NOT:

1. getting drunk and having sex with someone and regretting it the next day;
2. having a one night stand with someone and feeling guilty about it;
3. deciding the next day that you wanted to take back the consent you gave the night before;
4. being looked at;
5. being spoken to by an unattractive person; 
6. consensual heterosexual sex;
7. having sex and saying you were raped because your parents would be mad; or
8. cheating on a partner and calling it rape when you get caught out. 

Rant over for the day.

Time to halt BEE

A warm hello to my friends who are not in South Africa but who are interested in what is happening here. And another warm hello to all of those lovely liberal bunny huggers who think South Africa is a country of rainbows and happiness and that the white population is not being squeezed out of all aspects of citizenship (and that if they are they deserve it for daring to be successful 21 years after blacks took power) - including the economy which is almost literally a death sentence. Here is a piece by the extremely intelligent Anthea Jeffery regarding the South African policy of Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (BEE) which directly benefits the majority black population (80% and if you include coloured and the Chinese and Indians and everyone who is not white 91%) over the minority white population.

Time to halt BEE – replace with “economic empowerment for the disadvantaged”

by *Anthea Jeffery
Dr. Anthea Jeffery is Head of Policy Research at the IRR and author of Patents and Prosperity: Invention + Investment = Growth + Jobs, published this week by the IRR and available on the IRR website.
Dr. Anthea Jeffery is Head of Policy Research at the IRR.
A comprehensive audit of black economic empowerment (BEE) ownership deals since 2001, recently compiled by Intellidex, a consultancy, shows that R317bn, free of debt, has been transferred to black South Africans by the top 100 companies listed on the Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE).
The overall value of these deals is, of course, very much higher – and was estimated at some R600bn in 2013. Yet, despite the high costs of what has already been done, the pressure on business for ever more BEE deals is relentless.
The revised BEE generic codes of good practice, which took effect on 1st May 2015, make ownership a “priority” element for companies both large and small. For the first time, qualifying small enterprises or QSEs (those with annual turnover of between R10m and R50m) must also implement such deals, or see their “levels of BEE contribution” reduced by one level.
In the past, QSEs could choose four out of seven BEE elements to implement, which meant they could earn significant points without complying with the ownership rules. Under the revised codes, this flexibility has been removed.
Moreover, the aim of the new codes is not to encourage “broad-based” deals with employees or community trusts, which are to earn only 3 points out of 25. Instead, the emphasis is on narrow deals with the “100 black industrialists” the Government is trying to promote.
In addition, President Jacob Zuma claimed earlier this year that black South Africans own only 3% of listed shares on the JSE. According to the Presidency, only “direct” black ownership counts, while “indirect” black ownership – through the pension funds and other institutions that own the bulk of listed shares – is irrelevant. This means, the Presidency adds, that 22% of the JSE, with a value of some R2.6 trillion, still has to be transferred.
However, this perspective overlooks both the content of the codes and a series of research reports commissioned by the JSE. The latest JSE research (published in February 2015) puts black ownership of the JSE at 23%: 10% direct and 13% indirect.
Moreover, writes BEE expert Jenny Cargill, since black South Africans hold significant stakes in pension funds and the like, the aim should be to “measure black shareholder wealth in its entirety – not just the shareholding directly held by BEE entities”.
© 2012 Zapiro (All Rights Reserved)  Printed/Used with permission from
© 2012 Zapiro (All Rights Reserved)
Printed/Used with permission from
In addition, some 40% of JSE shares are owned by foreign investors and are not available for BEE redistribution. If this 40% is left out of account, as logic suggests, then black-owned shares make up 38% of the shares available and the 25% target has been met.
Far from acknowledging this, the Government is now using the revised codes to ratchet up the level of BEE ownership required from 25% to 51%. The pressure here comes not from the ownership element itself, but rather from the new element of “enterprise and supplier development” (ESD), which counts 40 points on the new scorecard.
The first sub-element of ESD is preferential procurement. Under the revised codes, extensive preferential procurement from firms with 25% black ownership now earns a mere 5 out of 25 points. By contrast, 13 points out of 25 are available for buying goods and services from BEE firms that are 51% black-owned or 30% black women-owned.
Then there is the “supplier and enterprise development” sub-element of ESD, for which 15 points can be earned for assisting BEE firms within and outside company supply chains. Under the revised codes, all contributions of this kind must now go to firms with 51% black ownership. Larger enterprises, those with annual turnover above R50m, are expected to contribute 3% of net profit after tax (NPAT) to such firms, while QSEs must put in 2% of NPAT.
No points are earned for contributions to firms with less than 51% black ownership. For larger enterprises, this is also a “priority” element – so failure to achieve 40% of the specified target will result in their levels of BEE contribution being reduced by one level.
Already, the new rules are putting pressure on companies that sell goods and services to larger enterprises to transfer 51% of their equity or assets to black people if they want to retain supply contracts often vital to their viability.
At the same time, Eskom wants the mining companies that supply coal to it to have 51% BEE ownership, even though the mining charter requires only 26%. So coal mining companies wanting to do business with the parastatal at a time of weak export markets are also under pressure to do additional BEE deals to reach this level of black ownership.
In 2013 wealthy Nigerian businessman Aliko Dangote warned against BEE ownership requirements, saying Nigeria used to have similar rules but had shed them because they deterred foreign direct investment (FDI).
In addition, where BEE ownership requirements rise to 51%, this could be seen as indirect expropriation and is likely to become a still more potent barrier to FDI.
However, instead of heeding Dangote’s warning, the ruling party is steadily shifting the goalposts on BEE ownership rules. Its underlying aim is not to provide redress for past injustice but rather to “eliminate” existing property relations in this more “radical” phase of the national democratic revolution (NDR).
It is time to call a halt to BEE, which needs to be replaced by a new focus on “economic empowerment for the disadvantaged” or “EED”. Instead of breaking down property rights in pursuit of a socialist nirvana, EED would emphasise all the right “Es”: from economic growth and excellent education to employment and entrepreneurship.
* Anthea Jeffery, Head of Policy Research at the Institute of Race Relations. Jeffery is also the author of BEE: Helping or Hurting?

Monday, 8 June 2015

Zim: The US and Britain are Tampering with the Weather

According to former education minister Sikhanyiso Ndlovu, Zimbabwe's land redistribution program has been a dismal failure because Britain and America have imposed sanctions on the country’s weather patterns.

I kid you not! This is an actual news report (at least it appears that way to me... I am open to correction). Is there no such thing as accountability in Zimbabwe? Are they just too ignorant to say that the redistribution program has been a resounding failure because they masses that they gave free land to had NO clue how to farm?

Nope... its always the white man's fault... And this is why they are failures and will always be failures... I know that there are quite a few conspiracy theories surrounding HAARP and all... but really? Do they really think that they are so much better than the white man if the white man is able to control their weather? 

I really needed the laugh today...

West tampering with our rainfall patterns: Sikhanyiso Ndlovu

A TOP Zanu PF official’s hypothesis for the failure of the party’s land redistribution programme is that Britain and America have imposed sanctions on the country’s weather patterns.

The stunning revelation was made by former education minister Sikhanyiso Ndlovu while addressing a public meeting in Bulawayo on Thursday.

Pressed to explain the decline in agricultural production, Ndlovu said Western countries are tampering with the country’s rainfall patterns in order to sabotage the land reform programme.

Zimbabwe embarked on the chaotic fast track land reform programme in 2000, forcefully taking prime agricultural land from the minority white farmers and parcelling it out to locals, most them supporters of the ruling Zanu PF party.

President Robert Mugabe says the programme was meant to correct historical wrongs in the distribution of land but opposition parties have accused Zanu PF of embarking on the programme as a way of propping up its waning fortunes.

Agricultural production has gone down drastically in the last fifteen years, with the government this year expected to import over 700,000 tonnes of maize from neighbouring to avert food shortages, partly caused by a dry spell sweeping through the country.

At independence Zimbabwe was said to be producing 28 million tonnes of maize, which declined to about 17 million tonnes in the 1990s.

“The West say we have failed. We have not; we are saying to them, bring the weather patterns to order and we will produce and even export to those countries,” Ndlovu said.

Ndlovu cited Stephen Hawking’s book Economic Hit-man, as containing damning evidence that western countries manipulated other nation’s rainfall patterns.

He reiterated his party’s official excuse that sanctions imposed on the country had wreaked havoc on the country’s economy.

Government is currently carrying out a land audit in various provinces and Zanu PF bigwigs who had been allocated large swathes of land are set to have some of the land repossessed.

By: Bulawayo Correspondent

Wednesday, 3 June 2015

Screw Your Diversity

Two days ago I reposted the drivel of a one Emily Goldstein (supposedly) who seems to think that the annihilation of the entire white race is the best thing since sliced bread – and that’s ok because she is allegedly white. I posted her drivel here.

Emily seems to think that we do not have a right to live – based on some arbitrary and propagandised history. Basically – because bad things were done by white people waaaaaaaaaaay back in the very distant past, each and every single one of us who happens to have pale skin is now some sort of demon spawn that should be killed off.

She thinks its a grand idea to breed whites out of existence by forcing them to breed with what she calls “minorities”. Firstly I should point out that Emily is a complete and utter moron because if she actually had any sense to go and do some research before writing this drivel, she would know that on a global scale white people ARE the minority. That means whites are already outnumbered by blacks, Indians and the Asians – by a factor of around 6:1. Its impressive don’t you think that a minority race is so adept at “oppressing” population groups that are so much bigger than they are? Says something about the intelligence of those groups doesn’t it?

Emily also seems to have forgotten the part of history where whites were oppressed and attacked and murdered en masse by blacks (ie: Moors who invaded Spain) as well as the Mongols who pushed far enough into Europe to only have been defeated by the Romans. She fails to make mention of the fact that white people have been sold into slavery, have been enslaved and oppressed by other races as well. And she also fails to mention that the first ever American slave owner happened to be a black man – seems to be a libtard disease though – selective memory.

She goes on to say that whiteness = racism. That simply by having a white skin, regardless of your age, sex, cultural background, opinions, thoughts, ideas, religion etc, you are automatically racist. In fact, her words actually make it seem like she thinks that just daring to be born with a white skin is racist itself. Damn my poor parents for being white and being attracted to other white people and therefore making me genetically white... Like its a choice we make.

But not only is being white racist, it also automatically makes you sexist, homophobic, transphobic, ableist, an anti-Semite. Islmaphobe and a heteropatriarchal capitalist. Now I will concede to being both an Islamaphobe and a capitalist (heteropatriarchal? Probably seeing as thinking that capitalism beats socialism and communism hands down in growing economies makes me even more of a horrid horrid racist).

I think that I may need to take a bit of break here and let all of you normal people out there know the meaning of t these terms and labels (all of which make you a horrible person if they apply to you – you know because you are not supportive of the liberal bunny hugger special snowflakes who happen to be abnormal in so many ways its getting hard to count... You can see some of the other things that we are not allowed to think or feel here)

Ableism: Prejudiced thoughts and discriminatory actions based on differences in physical, mental, and/or emotional ability; usually that of ablebodied / minded persons against people with illness, disabilities, or less developed skills / talents.

Example: I don’t think you can climb that mountain due to the fact that you weigh 400kg.
Sexism: Prejudiced thoughts and discriminatory actions based on difference in sex/gender; usually by men against women.
Example: OMG... the guy I was sitting next to on the train and whose privacy I violated by reading his Twitter feed over his shoulder is not following any women... everyday sexism.

Homophobia: The fear or hatred of homosexuality (and other nonheterosexual identities);
and persons perceived to be gay or lesbian.

Example: He said his religion says that two men having sex is a sin. How homophobic.

Transphobia: The fear or hatred of homosexuality (and other nonheterosexual identities), and persons perceived to be transgender and/or transexual.

Example: On realizing that the hot girl he picked up at the bar was actually a guy, Arthur had an outbreak of transphobia.

Related terms:
                Transgender: Appearing as, wishing to be considered as, or having undergone surgery to become a member of the opposite sex. Transgendered people can include transsexuals, crossdressers, drag kings/queens, masculine women, feminine men, and those who defy what society tells them is appropriate for their gender.

Transsexual: One who identifies as a gender other that of their biological sex.

AntiSemitism: The fear or hatred of Jews, Judaism, and related symbols.

                Example: The Holocaust.

Islamaphobia: Dislike of or prejudice against Islam or Muslims, especially as a political force.
                Example: We don’t think that Muslims should be allowed to come to our countries and complain about our culture and force us to change to suit them and we disagree with their violent religion.

Hetero: as in “straightness” and anything resembling the nuclear traditional family.
Patriarchal: this is the belief that women are oppressed by men economically, socially and political.

                Example: I believe that marriage should be between one man and one woman.

Somehow only white people can be guilty of any of the above and if we get rid of white people all of these things will stop and suddenly the human condition that has been in place since man arrived on this rock and is hardwired into our genetics as “natural“ will forever change and “minorities” will live in peace and friendship forever. Someone needs to inform the libtard that black tribes have been murdering and raping each other since time immemorial. So have muslims and every other race in between – it is not a “white” thing. Maybe someone should point out that the largest percentage (from what they can tell) of pedophiles in any population group is within the homosexual sect? (source) Perhaps she has no clue that in most African tribes women are literally purchased by their husbands (lobola - she can calculate how many cows she is worth here) or are kidnapped and raped so as to force a marriage (ukhutwale - usually of children which is not a crime because its their culture)?

Maybe little Emily should learn that anti-Semitism happens to be a commandment in that religious book the Muslims use to justify their savagery and backwardness. And maybe at some point she should be told that thinking someone is incapable if something based on physical, mental or emotional traits is not exactly a bad thing. I wonder how me thinking that a person who is 50kg neither looks good and is not in optimal health is so terrible... but then again, to the libtard bunch the truth and opinions are offensive. Such as this one: I don’t want to be exposed to people with HIV – that makes me ableist. This also does: I don’t think a paranoid schizophrenic should be walking around in public untreated.

Next our special snowflake goes on to tell us just how little culture white people have. I suppose that a culture of learning, education, development, progress, excellence and ambition makes us cultureless. Maybe it should be pointed out to the half-thawed snowflake that there is greater diversity in white culture than in any other “minority” group. But our little half-thawed snowflake seems to think that “White “culture” consists of nothing more than oppression, genocide, and the disenfranchisement of minorities. White “culture” is racism and nothing more. When white supremacists talk about “white culture”, what they’re really talking about is racism.” But yes, it makes every single white person on the planet feel all warm and fuzzy whenever another white person “oppresses” someone else.

And now we get to something we have heard before so often its become a cliché, snowflake’s assertion that “, white people have built a massive empire based entirely on the hard work of oppressed and disenfranchised minority groups.” Hmmmm... seems strange to me but I seem to recall that Europe was almost exclusively white for centuries and millennia and they were still developed... I wonder where those “minorities” were? My history tells me that almost all of the most important scientific discoveries and inventions were made by white? For a small sampling:

That computer you're typing on
The software that drives your computer
The Internet
Recorded music
Motion pictures
Light bulb
Rocketry (modern)
Printing press
Contact lenses
Microwave oven
Metallurgy (most discoveries and methods)
Materials science (plastics, compounds, & most other synthetics)95% of medical advancements
95% of life saving pharmaceutical drugs
The bulk of Mathematics, Physics, Chemistry, and Biology
Astronomy (most discoveries and mapping techniques)
Sea navigation (most advancements)
Discovery of DNA
Genetics (most research)
Laser technology and its myriad of uses
Nuclear energy
Modern agricultural techniques
Modern democracy
.... to name just a few

But she’s right... whites have done nothing. Its not like they have brought any of those inventions to other races. Its not like they have created space for them in their countries and communities. Its not like “minorities” are even allowed to walk around. And the stone age “minorities” would have all progressed to intergalactic space travel by now (ignoring the fact that just 400 years ago they were still in the stoneage) had the white man never been around. I mean sure, while the Romans were developing laws and building aqueducts and engaging in philosophical debates, the Africans, American Indians and South Americans were still living in mudhuts, wearing loin cloths and hunting with spears, and while the English were establishing monarchies to last for centuries and sending ships out to explore beyond the horizon and expand their territory, the Africans, American Indians and South Americans were still living in mudhuts, wearing loin cloths and hunting with spears and so they were still doing (and in some places still are doing), its not like the whites brought civilisation to them at all, nor religion that didn’t revolve around worshipping their ancestors, morals that told them that murdering and raping were wrong, that “medicine” from human body parts (usually albinos and young children) was wrong, whites also never brought the music of the greatest composers to the world, nor the books and poems of the greatest writers or even the greatest philosophical works still used to study today... never. White culture has nothing at all to do with excellence and ambition and desire to progress and explore... not at all *rolls eyes*

And Emily is happy that this culture and empire is coming to an end. She is happy that there will no more major breakthroughs in science and medicine because there will simply be no drive or ability to do it. She is happy that democracy, debate, growth and exploration will stop. A typical aspect of the conceited Marxist liberal mindset... bite the hand that feeds you and you get everything you want. She has also not realised that should the white race die out, it will not be long before the rest of the human race is scratching around in the dust trying to get back in touch with their caveman roots to make a living... it is widely known (but definitely not admitted) that whites are on average more intelligent than the majority of other races – Jews and Asians excepted. And in conjunction with that intelligence, there are the other virtues listed above which make the white race the most successful in terms of modernisation. So in a sense she may be right... humans will live much closer to nature because they will lose the ability to compete on a level above that of the animals and then the human race is doomed. Such a grand thing to look forward to...

Have the various white nations committed some heinous acts in history? Yes they have... it is fact and can never be erased. And yet somehow I feel the need to point out to snowflake that Ghengis Khan and the Mongols were not white...Nor were the Moors or Arabs or Chinese, Japanese nor Africans, Indians, Native Americans, nor any other “minority” where they have enslaved, murdered, raped and warred with each other for centuries. Snowflake should learn about human nature... it is natural to conquer and expand territory. Does she think that all those lovely “minorities” would prance around in the fields picking flowers and singing kumbaya all day? She needs a crash course in history. What one group has done to another is no worse than anything going before it in a time when conquest was a way of life. I will not try to condone any of the behaviour of any group nor shall I judge.

But then again, how is it possible that an entire race is held responsible for something that happened decades and centuries ago when none of them participated in any of it? Should we hold all Zulus responsible for the massacres at the hands of Shaka Zulu? Or all Mongols alive today responsible for the actions of Ghengis Khan? What about holding all North Koreans in future responsible (in fact any Korean or Asian for that matter) for the actions of Kim Jong-Il? How about future generations hold blacks responsible for the actions of Idi Amin, Robert Mugabe, Yakubu Gowon, Mengistu Haile Mariam? Maybe we should hold all Turks responsible for the actions of Ismail Enver Pasha who caused the deaths of 1.5 million Armenians?

You say no? Why? Because they’re not whites? Wow... nice double standard.

Snowflake says that people ask her how they can “atone” for being white and the “evils of whiteness”? Well I say that the “minorities” should be trying to figure out how to say thank you for everything they received from whites and every single discovery or invention that has helped them live longer, be healthier, have easier lives.

I also note that they have taken segregation in recent decades to mean “oppression”... I didn’t know that by keeping my evil white self away from blacks and Muslims etc was oppression... Somehow staying away from them and allowing them to leech off of our success because we its safer for our own families is oppression just as much as if we live in their communities and raise standards and values... If it were not for the inclination of most minority groups to be involved in crime and violence then there wouldn’t be the need to stay separate (time to start deporting the lot of them back to their own countries round about now and leave them to fend for themselves without the white man as a crutch...).

She is correct is saying that white birthrates are very low and that “minorities” are outbreeding us... And its simply because of superior morals, education, compassion and liberal Marxist ideology. Whites have developed a culture of only having children that you can afford to feed, clothe and educate properly. This is something foreign to almost all other races (look at China where this kind of thing had to be legislated for crying out loud) where it is normal to have up to 10+ children regardless of your economic situation and means. Whites (used to) have a moral culture where sleeping around and having children outside of wedlock is frowned upon. It was also important to have a strong family unit with both mother and father in attendance teaching their children the same morals. But because the white race is so compassionate, we invite all of the “poor, oppressed minorities” into our countries and give them free everything (housing, healthcare, education etc) just so that they can outbreed us, create violence and crime and no-go zones simply because of some irrational fear of being called a racist. And thanks to the growth of cultural Marxism we see all of western ideology and nationalism being eroded through feminism, socialism, gay rights movements, atheism (yes I am a Christian so sue me) and so many other politically correct mechanism. And that is why our compassion and kindness will see us eventually wiped out by ignorant, violent “minorities that liberals love to parade and make into victims.

And then our very special snowflake hits on something near and dear to me – South African whites – of which I happen to form part. This prime example of libtard thinking has no clue what she is talking about. She seems to forget that the economy exists only because of white South Africans. That the blacks were NOT indigenous to South Africa and that the whites had been living there for over 100 years before they even met a bantu black. She has no clue that the bantu colonised South Africa as well at around the same time as the whites. She has no clue that blacks were NEVER slaves in South Africa and that Apartheid was implemented to keep the white population safe from blacks. She has no idea that blacks were never excluded from the economy and completely funded by white taxpayer money. Mike Smith has a fantastic series on Apartheid which can be found here.

Somehow this very special snowflake thinks that it is a grand thing to keep whites out of the economy like they have been doing for the past 21 years (through BEE, AA and EE) – she will never concede that this has not had any positive influence in the lives of black people because they simply do not know how to compete in business with whites. They lack the work ethic, ability, education and wherewithal – because they demand for free everything that the white man has worked his ass off for. It must all be given to the blacks for free. In this paragraph she is subtly condoning and celebrating the horrific murders of white South Africans at the hands of savage blacks who are incapable of independent thought. And in terms of her little ill-informed (and self-hating) rant this blog post would be punishable by imprisonment because it shows her and her savage “minorities” to be just what they are – incapable of competing with a white person in any sphere on any level. And maybe someone should point out to her that “free speech” is a western concept created by whites! None of her “minority” cultures allow for it and in fact punish it severely.

And a world without whites will look like Africa – dark and destitute. Strange how she fails to see this. Every single country that achieves the most is almost invariably run by whites (Japan excepted). It is the white man that came up with the concept of human rights – and places with the highest human rights abuses happen to be run by and populated in the main with “minorities”.

But sure... whites are the problem. I wonder when she will go and let herself be “diversified” and see how she feels about it. My bet is that she has never actually spoken to a “minority” in her life let alone lived among them. I wonder how much she will be praying for the end of the white race when she and her family have felt the effects of “diversity” first hand? But you know what? She is probably so far gone and the liberal disease has spread so far that the second she is confronted with “diversity” she will find someway to blame the white man...

So in closing... Emily Goldstein (internet troll extraordinaire) maybe you should get a head start on the rest of us (those “white supremacists” that are proud of our heritage, culture and whiteness and are intent on preserving it) how to be annihilated... go get diversified already.