Search This Blog

Wednesday, 23 October 2013

Liberalism: True Political Ideology or Mental Disorder?

In an article that is extremely similar to one that I was looking into writing (but hardly with the depth and politeness in response to an article by Spacygirl where she revels in her liberal or even libtard title) here is an opinion piece written by one Deon van Rensburg on the site. 

Before we can even start to answer that question we need to understand what Liberalism is. We also need to understand that there is something called “Classic” Liberalism and “Modern” or “Progressive” Liberalism.
Liberalism as a Political Movement has existed for the past four centuries. Starting with the Renaissance, defining itself with the French Revolution and culminating in the formation of the United States of America. A common thread throughout the last three centuries preceding our own have been that common people were tired with being oppressed and with that in mind they freed themselves either through mediation, emigration and sometimes bloody revolution as was the case with the French Revolution.
Since the USA was formed by the founding fathers to relieve themselves from the oppressing yoke of subjugation to the British Empire it stands to reason that the early arrivals of Dutch and German Protestants and French Huguenots in the Cape of Good Hope were also acts of liberalism in that they emigrated to escape religious, cultural and political persecution by not only the Roman Catholic Church but also repressive governments and monarchies. It then logically follows that the Boers left the British colony of the Cape in the same liberal defiance to British subjugation in 1838 for the Great Trek – and subsequent founding of the Boer Republics - only to be once more to be the victim of the British Colonial Empire 60 years later. A victim also of policies that had at its heart social engineering by means of racialist discrimination through law that was not present during the existence of the Boer Republics. (I use the word racialist as the word racist was only coined in 1918 and first appeared in print in 1930)
In the run-up to the World War 1 liberalism was what is now termed “Classic Liberalism” which did not mock religion, family values, morals, ethics and the belief in hard work but rather abhorred the idea of large intrusive and coercive Governments with everybody allowed a place in the sun. The credo of classic liberalism is freedom – as long as you were tolerant of other’s freedoms.
Before and during World War 1 Communist leaders expected the common workers to turn their backs upon their respective Governments and that a glorious revolution would take place in the name of Communism. As we now know this never happened and although the Russian Revolution took place – and Hungary was under the control of Communism for a very short span of time from 1918-1919 (and a short lived Communist revolt in Germany that was easily put down by soldiers returning from the front lines) – the massive Communist revolution never took place. This forced the leaders of Communism to rethink their strategy.
After World War 1 “Classic” liberalism began to morph into “Modern” liberalism with the economist John Maynard Keyns at the forefront in the West with his theory that free reigning markets are not the answer and that more Government intervention is needed in the economy. During the same time the Russian Revolution took place and Vladimir Lenin and especially Leon Trotsky saw an opportunity in “Modern” Liberalism to further the Communist cause. Leon Trotsky had such extremist views that he was assassinated in Mexico on the orders of Joseph Stalin – a man who was responsible of up to 30 million deaths during his reign of terror. Lenin famously referred to the modern liberal intelligentsia as “useful idiots” that just needed a nudge in the right direction.
It is also Leon Trotsky that coined the most over-used word in the world – racist. The context of the word has subsequently been divorced from the original meaning Trotsky had in mind. Calling someone a “racist” is the favoured ad hominem of progressive liberals painting everybody who does not agree with them as some form of jackboot wearing, SS flag waiving Nazi white supremacist.
At this point I should interject Cultural Marxism.  With Economic Marxism - that placed Russia under the control of Communists  - not working in the West the plan was for a far more insidious and clever tactic to be used. Economic Marxism is a blunt instrument that smashes everything in its path but Cultural Marxism is intelligent, precise and a long-term strategy that would destroy the culture of the Western World as surely as an atom bomb – but from the inside.
Cultural Marxism is an offshoot of Western Marxism which itself is another variation of Marxism as theorised by Marx and Engels. At its core is the subversion of Western institutions such as schools, universities, media, entertainment industry, family values, cultural heritage and religion - specifically Western religion that by definition is Christianity. It has its foundations firmly rooted in the Frankfurt School where the theories of, amongst others, Antonio Gramsci and George Lukacs found a home and whose venomous results can be seen in “intelligent” public discourse today as well as the plethora of societal ills.
Liberalism had by the 1960’s become infected with Socialist ideology – thanks to the Frankfurt School and radicals such as Saul Alinsky with his book (12) Rules for Radicals - with ever growing governments, government interference into day-to-day life and a growing entitlement class. Cultural Marxism began to subtly manifest itself in the latter part of the 1960’s – predominantly within the hippy culture - but by the 1990’s it was firmly entrenched in the hearts and minds of radicals and those who were inclined towards Socialist doctrine. Intelligent discourse, reason, logic, a respect for proven fact and understanding cause and effect went the way of the Dodo.
With this Cultural Marxist monkey on the back the next step was a logical one and one that we should abhor in totality – Political Correctness. Political Correctness stifles any meaningful debate about social issues due to the inherent nature of “that wasn’t nice to say” and “racism”. Political Correctness (as we know it) has its origins in the 1970’s UK liberal scene when the New Left adopted it and has subsequently spread like wildfire throughout the world. Even Conservatives bow down to the might of PC or run the risk of being labelled some type of hatemonger in the form of homophobe, Islamophobe, racist, anti-Feminist et al. Being labelled a racist, bigot or right wing extremist seems to be a damning accusation. The mark of “racist” has the equivalent value of a chemical weapon. Even being Conservative or “Classic” liberal means that in the PC world you are a right wing lunatic – such is the indoctrination that Cultural Marxism and its tool, Political Correctness, has heaped upon the world. Apparently – according to an article published in the US – police dogs are now also deemed to be racist and in England the use of the terms “whitelist” and “blacklist” has racist undertones and can no longer be used by the Metropolitan Police. I personally refer to PC as Political Clownery due to the base absurdity of it.
*Note that the term Political Correct has its origins as a colloquialism and described debates about the dogmatic application of Stalinism between Communist Party members and Socialists – another link to Communism / Socialism to ponder*
Today we see the destructive influence of the Keynsian theory of economics as well as the poisonous and corrosive influence that Socialism and Cultural Marxism has had on the world. The United Kingdom can best be described as a “Nanny State” with an ever-growing entitlement culture, the USA in a state of crisis with itself and also a fully-fledged entitlement state with more people on coupons and hand-outs than are actually working in some States and a outstanding debt exzceeding $16 Trillion. Most of the Nordic countries are trying to survive a tidal wave of foreign immigrants from Muslim and North African countries. The PIGS countries – Portugal, Ireland, Greece and Spain – are stark reminders of the entitlement state gone wrong with too few people contributing too little for the entitlement benefits of too many leading to fiscal meltdown. Islamic and African refugees are flooding the West demanding the West conform to their culture and religion and progressive liberals stand at the front preaching multi-culturism. The problem for progressive liberals is that multi-culturism is not a one-way street as they so often spew from their self proclaimed morally superior soapboxes. When in Rome…Logic would dictate that if you leave your country of origin due to whatever reason you assimilate into your new host country’s culture – that however is not the reality as immigrants force their culture and religious beliefs upon the natives of the land whilst progressive liberals stand idly by applauding in their naivety, patting themselves on the back and saying to each other “Well done” whilst not reflecting on any long term consequences.
So it comes as no surprise that there is a backlash from the “right-wing” groupings and political parties such as the EDL, UKIP, Front Nationale, Mouvement souverainiste du Qu├ębec, the Tea Party, Australian Protectionist Party, Golden Dawn and Partij voor de Vrijheid just to name a few. Recently an immigrant scholar at WITS University likened all of these interested parties to white supremacists and Nazi’s. Maybe someone should enlighten this person as to Godwin’s Law or reductio ad Hitlerum as it is a fallacy of irrelevance.
Liberalism used to be a valid political ideology but no more. It is now a stain upon the soul of man with Totalitarian Socialist control at its centre.
So the question remains – is liberalism a mental disorder? Is it purely a neurosis or is there a deep-seated mental deficiency that makes the liberally inclined want to give up control of its own destinies to be coddled, like a child, by a protective benevolent government from cradle to the grave? They certainly seem to jump at every opportunity to commit racial, ethnic and cultural hara-kiri and encourage, no force, people around them to do the same.
Liberalism is not a simple neurosis although the projection of white-guilt may lead one to think that it is. No, it is more complicated than just a white person feeling guilty about his heritage and how he got to his or her station in life through the actions of his ancestors. Liberals ignore the first rule of nature – only the strong survive and instead opt to artificially manipulate society blaming the exceedingly long list of  progressive liberal ideological failures on “white privilege”. Ignorance obviously plays a central role in this construct of “white privilege”.
Various leading psychiatrists support my point of view. Doctor Lyle A Rossiter (Jnr) MD, a veteran psychiatrist with 35 years experience and no known ties or ideologies that can even remotely be construed as Conservative or right wing. With a track record of treating 1 500 patients during his career he wrote a book in 2008 entitled “The Psychological Causes of Political Madness” in which he states:  “Based on strikingly irrational beliefs and emotions, modern liberals relentlessly undermine the most important principles on which our freedoms were founded,” …“Like spoiled, angry children, they rebel against the normal responsibilities of adulthood and demand that a parental government meet their needs from cradle to grave.”… “A social scientist that understands human nature will not dismiss the vital roles of free choice, voluntary cooperation and moral integrity – as liberals do,” ... “A political leader who understands human nature will not ignore individual differences in talent, drive, personal appeal and work ethic, and then try to impose economic and social equality on the population – as liberals do. And a legislator who understands human nature will not create an environment of rules which over-regulates and over-taxes the nation’s citizens, corrupts their character and reduces them to wards of the state – as liberals do.”
I searched the Internet in a hopeless attempt to find an intelligent response and critique to the contrary but what I found most often than not is the following response: “He’s stupid”. Ah, the age of true intellectualism and use of knowledge seems to have been eclipsed by the age of Idiocracy.
Doctor Adam Savage, a well-known radio commentator syndicated to 350 radio stations in the USA, actually wrote a book in 2005 called “Liberalism is a Mental Disorder”. He is also the author of numerous other titles dealing with psychological disorders. He identified certain instances that support his prognosis and which have in the interim been proven correct by the Occupy movement and the hysterics of the Democrats during last year’s Presidential election in the USA not to mention the antics of Femen and perpetually stupid groupings such as Pussy Riot (I wonder if they really had to debase themselves to get their message across)
• Expecting constant praise and admiration
• Being overly jealous of others’ achievements
• Expecting (no demanding) that others follow ideological plans
• Setting unrealistic goals
• A sense of entitlement
• Trouble maintaining healthy relationships
All of these symptoms seem to define an individual who is unable to express their frustration in a rational manner – like liberals do. The Mayo Clinic stated it best: “In order to make yourself feel better, you may react with rage or contempt and efforts to belittle the other person to make yourself appear better.”
In his book Doctor Savage ultimately identifies Narcissistic Personality Disorder as the cause of progressive liberalism.
Wikipedia contains the following easy to understand explanation on NPD: “Although individuals with NPD are often ambitious and capable, the inability to tolerate setbacks, disagreements or criticism, along with lack of empathy, make it difficult for such individuals to work cooperatively with others or to maintain long-term professional achievements. With narcissistic personality disorder, the individual's self-perceived fantastic grandiosity, often coupled with a hypomanic mood, is typically not commensurate with his or her real accomplishments. “.
Enter the Dunning-Kruger effect. “Dunning and Kruger noted earlier studies suggesting that ignorance of standards of performance is behind a great deal of incompetence. This pattern was seen in studies of skills as diverse as reading comprehension, operating a motor vehicle, and playing chess or tennis.
Dunning and Kruger proposed that, for a given skill, incompetent people will:
• tend to overestimate their own level of skill;
• fail to recognize genuine skill in others;
• fail to recognize the extremity of their inadequacy;
• recognize and acknowledge their own previous lack of skill, if they are exposed to training for that skill.
The last point is extremely difficult to achieve, as described by social commentator and film producer Slavoj Zizek in his 2012 film “The Perverts’ Guide to Ideology”. His main thesis is that ideology in its most powerful form is hidden from the view of the person who submits to it. “Once it can be clearly perceived it effectively loses its power of social control... it hurts to step outside of it and examine it critically; by default we tend to resist seeing the world from any angle other than the one fed to us.” A worldview constantly fed to us by artists, musicians, journalists, entertainment, educators and political demagogues.
But that is not the end for NPD. “Psychiatrist Glen Gabbard suggested NPD could be broken down into two subtypes. He saw the "oblivious" subtype as being grandiose, arrogant, and thick-skinned and the "hyper-vigilant" subtype as being easily hurt, oversensitive, and ashamed. In his view, the oblivious subtype presents for admiration, envy, and appreciation of a powerful, grandiose self that is the antithesis of a weak internalized self, which hides in shame, while the hyper-vigilant subtype neutralizes devaluation by seeing others as unjust abusers.”
It is also my contention that progressive liberalism exhibits many of the traits of Sociopathic Personality Disorder as outlined below and identified by the FBI Behavioural Analysis Unit:
  • Glibness and Superficial Charm
  • Manipulative and Conning
  • Grandiose Sense of Self  - Feels entitled to certain things as "their right."
  • Pathological Lying - Has no problem lying coolly and easily and it is almost impossible for them to be truthful on a consistent basis.
  • Lack of Remorse, Shame or Guilt - A deep-seated rage, which is split off and repressed, is at their core. Does not see others around them as people, but only as targets and opportunities. The end always justifies the means and they let nothing stand in their way.
  • Shallow Emotions  - Outraged by insignificant matters, yet remaining unmoved and cold by what would upset a normal person.
  • Need for Stimulation - Promiscuity and gambling are common.
  • Callousness/Lack of Empathy - Unable to empathize with the pain of their victims, having only contempt for others' feelings of distress and readily taking advantage of them.
  • Poor Behavioural Controls/Impulsive Nature -Rage and abuse, alternating a belief that they are all-powerful, all-knowing, entitled to every wish, no concern for their impact on others.
  • Irresponsibility/Unreliability - Not concerned about wrecking others' lives and dreams. Oblivious or indifferent to the devastation they cause. Does not accept blame themselves, but blames others, even for acts they obviously committed.
  • Promiscuous Sexual Behaviour – Promiscuity and sexual acting out of all sorts.
  • Criminal or Entrepreneurial Versatility - Changes their image as needed to avoid prosecution. Changes life story readily when confronted.
  • Contemptuous of those who seek to understand them - (and I’m sure I’ll receive a lot of contempt for this piece)
  • Does not perceive that anything is wrong with them (Dunning-Kruger)
  • Authoritarian – does not tolerate any opinions or points of view that differs from theirs. Total control at all times
  • Secretive – the use of false Facebook profiles, anonymous campaigns and secret groups come to mind
  • Paranoid – everyone that does not conform to his or her world view must be a member of some secret right wing grouping intent on subjugating the rest of the world into some white supremacist Utopia.
  • Only rarely in difficulty with the law, but seeks out situations where their tyrannical behaviour will be tolerated, condoned, or admired
  • Conventional appearance – yes they walk among us, look like us, talk like us
  • Goal of enslavement (of their victim(s))
  • Exercises despotic control over every aspect of societal life
  • Ultimate goal is the creation of a willing victim – or in this case a willing victim mentality
  • Extreme narcissism and grandiose
  • May state readily that their goal is to rule the world – anyone familiar with George Soros and his history?

As was seen from the recent debacle and subsequent tragedy surrounding Carina Papenfus / Flippie Engelbrecht / Johnny Burger - exposed on Carte Blanch a few weeks ago - many of the traits shown above was exhibited; you can decide for yourself which traits came to the fore. The same can be said about the vitriol filled responses by various “opinion formers” to civil action groups such as Red October and Afriforum – even though the right of these groups to peaceful protest and freedom of association are enshrined in the South African Constitution. The inclusion of the term “racist” in every other article – although photographic proof to the contrary exists – is typical of the narrow minded myopic view liberals hold of the world. Fortunately, and because of its over use, the etiquette of racist is becoming more and more consequenter
I noted with some amusement the campaign to stop companies from having advertising banners on the “racist” Praag website and after a little digging found it to be the same group that laid formal – and may I say libellous - complaints against Sunette Bridges at the SAHRC for “racism”– which was dismissed out of hand by the SAHRC due to a lack of any meaningful content. Who then targeted the Facebook pages of Sunette Bridges and BKA by complaining to Facebook about overt racism (and in the process got their own little clubhouse shut down by Facebook). The same group that hides behind dozens of fake Facebook profiles and slanders all and sundry that they deem to be “racist”, “homophobic” ad infinitum when compared to their non-existent set of self-righteous morals vomited upon the world from every conceivable soap box they can find. A vile little group of division sowers and race baiters if ever there were one.
It seems that modern or “progressive” liberalism is in fact no longer a political ideology but rather a mental disorder more associated with religious cult leaders and followers. And make no mistake – progressive liberalism is a religion although socio-political in nature. It’s sermons are is driven by quasi-intellectual discussion prompted by observations made with extreme cognitive bias and uses books such as Rules for Radicals, Unpacking the Invisible Knapsack (by Peggy McIntosh) and After Hegemony (by Robert Keohane) as their bibles with Karl Marx as their saviour.
“Whoever undertakes to set himself up as a judge of Truth and Knowledge is shipwrecked by the laughter of the gods.” – Albert Einstein

You can see the original and associated comments here

Sunday, 20 October 2013

“See this skin? This is white. We are not afraid of this colour any more. We are in charge now. My skin is brown”.

“I am not afraid of your skin. You whites aren’t in charge any more. We are in charge now and my skin is brown”

Black Edenvale cops accused of racially abusing and assaulting two young white men in Edenvale, South Africa.

Sunday October 13 2013 Two young white men in Edenvale who were arrested under a trumped up traffic offence were beaten up by six black police officers who had formed a line-up to beat the white man.
The arresting officer said to the men, grabbing one of their cheeks: holding it: “See this skin? This is white. We are not afraid of this colour any more. We are in charge now. My skin is brown. My gunholster is black, my boots are black, but my skin is brown. Jacob Zuma’s town now, you whites are not in charge any more’.
‘He comes up to my cheek and pulls it and says see this colour, I am not scared of this colour any more. We are in charge now’.
Sunday morning Engen garage in Mansfield. “I was handcuffed very tightly, one police man was holding me over the table, rolled my shirt up, five or six cops came into a line and started pummeling me on my back, my head, my backside. I was very bruised. If this happened next time..."
Ndluma Hlamini police spokesman confirmed a case of racist assault was lodged by the two men.
The young men do not want to be identified for fear of victimization, says EWN (Eye Witness News) which organization only posted a video of the video interview on its website on Saturday 19 October 2013.

Reblogged from Violence Against Whites

Wednesday, 16 October 2013

How Much Land Is REALLY Owned By The SA Government

We have all undoubtedly seen the lovely messages of hate love sent to the white community by the members of Juju's EFF. These messages include: “A revolutionary must become a cold killing machine motivated by pure hate”, "Honeymoon is over for white people in South Africa" and "We need to kill them like they killed us'".

We have also heard his main campaign promise: That we will take the land without compensation (implying Mugarbage style landgrabs and the violence associated herewith - kinda lends some support to the Red October March now huh?)

These are all predicated on the widespread belief in the propaganda that has been spewed by the ANC for years in order to keep the masses seeing the white man as the cause of all of their hardships even 20 years into their reign over the country. This is the same tired old line that the whites own 80% of the land and that it was apparently somehow stolen from them. 

Then I came across the lovely well researched article on Censorbugbear-Reports by Adriana Stuijt:

How much land is REALLY owned by the SA State? And how much land is REALLY owned by 'Whites'?

“ We shall dismantle the apartheid-landscapeJacob Zuma to SA parliament… “ " We shall dismantle the apartheid landscape, which dictated where people should live and work on the basis of the colour of their skin. To this day, we are still working to reverse this legacy, hence the review of the ‘willing buyer, willing seller’ principle in order to accelerate the equitable distribution of land. You will recall as well that the education system was also used as an instrument to ensure perpetual subjugation as stated by Hendrik Verwoerd…’ 
In February 2012, the ANC leaders again were claiming that '80% of all the land still belongs to ‘the whites’. They claimed in 1994 that 'more than 90% of all the land stil belongs to the whites'.
  • But they were always lying: 41% of the entire SA land surface used to belong to the black homelands: and now is State-owned land.
However – where does the ANC-regime get their 'facts"? The SA land registries are in such a shambles that thus far, they have for instance not even incorporated the 41% of the SA land surface which were owned by the former independent homelands. Those all are State Lands where millions of black people continue to live and run subsistence-farms:
The 2011 Land Registry survey shows that 64,976 of the former 85,000 commercial (white) farms were already owned by the State by then...
According to a March 2011 land-registry survey summary to parliament, the SA State - even before incorporating the 41% of the land-surface from the homelands -- already owned 64,976 of all the 85,000 (+) ‘white’ commercial farms by then.
Land Registry Records STILL do not include the 41% (1,2million+ square km) of the total SA land surface which used to be the tribal homelands
The bottom line is that the ANC-regime doesn’t know the exact extent of its own state-land holdings because its Land Registry Records still by October 2013, do not include the 41% of the total SA land surface of 1,214,470 sq km which used to be the independent tribal homelands.All this tribal land now is also officially owned by the State although not lodged in any land-registries…
90% of all these ‘redistributed farms’ are idle:
FARMLAND 90 PERCENT OF BLACK OWNED FARMS FAILING BBC REPORTBy March 2011 the State owned 64,976 farms, 5448 'agricultural holdings'; and 41% of SA’s entire land surface  in the former tribal homelands – which are not as yet registered in the Land Registry office and thus are also not listed as ‘State-owned’ in their official land-registries. All their public pronouncements claiming that ‘Whites own 80% of all the lands’ are clearly inaccurate propaganda.  The former home-lands remain available to farming -- and are being farmed by millions of black people today; and the State in 1994 also inherited  another1,085,084 state-owned urban sites:  which are mostly municipalities and their parcels designated for township developments, as well as inheriting large military-holdings, forests and wildlife reserves.
In 2008 -  only 0.79% of the country’s land surface was under permanent crops: only 14,980 square km was under irrigation
The CIA observations from space have also registered the fact that by the end of 2008, although SA previously had  access to 12.1% ‘arable land’ of its total land surface -- only 0.79% of the land was under permanent crops – of which 14,980 sq km were irrigated in 2008.
FARMLAND p2 OWNED BY THE STAT mar 2011 reportABOVE: In March 31 2011, a total 1,155,508 Land parcels were identified as State land – of which 1,085,084 were urban, 64,976 were state-owned farms and 5,448 were state-owned agricultural holdings.  In addition 41% of the SA land-surface were former black homelands: now also owned by the State and occupied/farmed by millions of black people. Entire SA Land Deed Registration Survey report to Parliament, March 2011:
BELOW: Land-parcels formerly belonging to autonomous tribal homelands, and of course still occupied and farmed in 2011 by the same tribal groups, occupy some 41% of the total SA land surface – yet are not registered in the current Land Deeds Registry Office at all -- and ‘cannot be reconciled’ as per below, per province: (so how can ‘whites own 80% of all the land?)
Above -- Up to 41 % of all the SA land (private and state) was however also identified as being in the formerly independent black homelands – and which parcels could not be reconciled with the SA Deeds Registration System because this land was under the hegemony of autonomic black-tribal entities and was not registered in the SA Deeds office before 1994. After 1994, the homelands ceased to exist. However -- Millions of  black South Africans still maintain subsistence farms and settlements there  in e.g. Gazankulu, Bophuthatswana, QwaQwa, Bantu trusts, Kwa-Zulu, Transkei, Venda etc.
Arable farm-land in South Africa occupied only 6% percent of entire land-surface which was proven to be suitable for renewable, irrigated  food-cropping:
In 1994, the SA revenue registers showed that there were between 85,000 and 100,00 privately-owned, food-producing farms in South Africa, which employed more than 1,6-million workers – all taxpayers who lived on the farms with their families. These farms ever only produced this excess-food on less than SIX PERCENT of the entire surface of the country – although according to the CIA, 12,1 percent of SA is considered ‘arable’ land.
The effect on the SA agricultural sector:
By 2010, there were only 1,000 grain-producing commercial farmers  left : Grain-SA
  • By 2010, the Grain-SA Cooperative reported a membership of only 1,000 grain-producing farmers in the entire country. The rest of the members in the Transvaal Agricultural Union and Agri-SA produce many other food-crops and products from livestock – while many commercial farmers also generated extra income by turning to the lower-overhead wildlife-farming and game-lodge tourism and hunting industry.
2011: Only 14,000 privately-owned, registered commercial farms remain on the taxpayers-registry: However what this careful survey of these disreputable records in the SA Deeds Registration Office did reveal, was that there's considerably more land owned by the State than they realize or want to admit to:
  • from the original 85,000 privately-owned food-producing farms which used to be in the hands of ‘white’ owners -  ("Boer farms") , only about 14,000 farms and smallholdings in 2010 were still registered at the SA Revenue Office as being  revenue-producing ‘white-owned commercial agricultural sites’-
  • all the other farms are in the hands of the State, including of course all the former homelands, the municipalities and huge parcels of unused military land and forests, wildlife reserves etc. 
In 2008 -  only 0.79% of the country’s land surface was under permanent crops: only 14,980 square km was under irrigation
SouthAfrica Satellite View Weather EuymetsatFeb142012
Only 0,79 percent of SA's 12.1% of 'arable farm lands' were actually under permanent crops by 2009
The CIA observations from space have also registered the fact that semi-arid South Africa’s crop production has dropped dramatically since 1994:  by the end of 2008, SA‘s total land surface comprised of 12.1% ‘arable’ farmable land’  -- but only 0.79% of this land was under permanent crops :  of which 14,980 sq km were irrigated in 2008. 
South Africa is a very arid country with irregular supplies of running surface-water in many regions. The country's agricultural production is largely reliant on the eleven-year drought/excessive rainfall cycle caused by the El Nino/El Nina weather phenomenon in the southern hemisphere - which is linked to the sun's eleven-year solar-flare cycles.
The commercial farmers over the years successfully adapted their production-methods to this phenomenon over the past two centuries, preserving water in farm-dams for times of drought, carting in tons of natural fertilizer from off-shore islands, using the crop-rotation system to replenish and enrich the soul,  and devising other ways of increasing dry-land food production.
Yet despite the fact that 90% of the 'redistributed farms' now lay totally idle and produce no food whatsoever - -- the South African government is still going full-steam ahead with its land-nationalisation programme.
Intelligence General Laws Amendment Bill
We shall dismantle the apartheid landscape: Jacob Zuma:
Land use, South Africa, CIA:

Tuesday, 15 October 2013

How To Renounce Your White Privilege

I really wanted to have a serious go at one Gillian Schuttte - or as she is known in my private world as the feminazi hypocrite who married  a black man just to help destroy the white race - for her drivel about white privilege. Until I found this and I realised that making fun of her probably makes her more pissed off than me explaining to her why I would prefer to have a white man in my bed, to have white babies with him, to put my family first and create a strong unit, to forego the abortion, buy my own birth control, choose not to dress like a hooker, not sleep with every Tom, Dick or Sipho I come across and then say how I've been raped by their manipulation, how I like to wear make up and look pretty and desirable for my man, how I think that being feminine is more important than getting the job before the man, and how my career is only fourth on my list behind God, my fiance and family and my health in my life and finally why I don't feel even the slightest hint of guilt for having a white skin.

I’ve noticed an increasing number of opinion pieces and social media posts commenting on the phenomenon of white privilege. Usually I ignore this fluff because, well, fuck it, I think it’s a load of bullshit. Not the concept, just the tired, dreary “whites must basically shut the fuck up” tone of the narrative. Cool. Fine. No problem. 

Whiteys have definitely had it pretty good in this place for a long time. Woo hoo for Whitey, in fact. 

But come on. Seriously, the psychobabble, pseudo-intellectual (are those words, I don’t know, but they seem suitable mocking) bollocks that ends up being written by some numb nuts in an oversized tie-dye shirt with Incan prayer beads dangling from the neck is a crock of shit. I might be wrong. I probably am. It’s just what I think.

One such waffle-fest caught my eye this weekend on the appropriately named Mail & Guardian Thought Leader (all other pompous white names already belonged to the Daily Maverick) blog.

Titled A comprehensive guide to white privilege in South Africa, I initially thought, "hmmm, just what I've been looking for on this Sunday afternoon."

Before clicking on the link I noticed all manner of plaudits being sent the way of the author via social networks. “Should be interesting,” I said to Rocket the dog, who immediately urged me not to open the piece lest her doggie privilege be taken away.

Well, knock me down with a call for sanctions, but I am enlightened. I didn’t actually realise what a horrible, white person I was. 

Release the burden

To make sure you don’t fall into the same trap, I’ve assembled this handy guide for understanding white privilege and the steps you can take to hand over your white privilege. Follow me, be free, release the burden of being a whitey…

Are you a white family with a black maid or gardener? Well, guess what you racists? You're actually demeaning their very existence. Fire them. Fire them now. Stop employing people through your neo-colonial liberal view of the world, you enslaving masters of white superiority. Wash your own fucking dishes for once, white pricks. What? You give to charity too, and to a bursary fund for previously disadvantaged kids at your old university. Jesus Christ, why don’t you just put a bumper sticker on your car that says "I hate blacks". It’ll be more obvious that you’re trying to subjugate the masses then. 

Do you wake up in the morning and worry about making ends meet, paying the school fees, wondering if you have enough money for petrol, hoping that today is the day you might get a raise, fret over your job security? Huh, you do? Well, believe it or not, you miserable racist scum bug, that’s the most racist thing you can do. How can you live in South Africa and not worry about the poor people. Forget about your capitalist constructs. Do some good. Give someone a job for fuck sakes. Though not a black person, because that’s an insult. You are so fucked, man. 

Tweeting for rhinos, hey? Worried about the icecaps melting, hmmm? Concerned that your children will have to go online just to see some of the animals that once roamed this continent. Ja, I’ll bet you are, you racist, white supremacist prick. How dare you. HOW DARE YOU. Fuck the animals. Fuck them. 

Do you go to the shops and buy clothes? Clothes, goddamit?! And then wear them in front of black people. What is your problem? Do you even understand that spending money is more racist than saying “I’m not racist, but…”

You’re probably reading this on a laptop or tablet or smartphone, aren’t you, you superior white colonialist. You probably have a white sheet on your head too. Fucking racist. Stop being so privileged.

Worried about crime, the country’s future, the safety of your children? Oh my god, you’re so white you probably do the awkward white man handshake in your head every time you see a black man approaching you in the street. 

You watch English Premiership and Jamie Oliver on DStv, don’t you, you vile black-hating cretin. Can you say “apartheid” because that’s exactly what you’re thinking when you watch these programmes. I don’t understand it either, but that’s exactly what you’re doing, HF. 

White privilege is writing a blog with your fancy electronic device on a website called Thought Leader telling white people what white privilege is. Stop this. Stop this, immediately. In fact, blogging is white privilege. Get some fucking pencils and write a letter to the paper. Actually, having paper is white privilege. Just think about your white privilege quietly in the corner. Hang on, having a corner means you have a home, which is a key aspect of white privilege. Oh fuck, I’m so confused. 

*ps: please note that this column is an effort to mock the pompous tone of the Thought Leader column. If there are racists among you who want to high five me because you think I have a problem with non-white people (fuck it – white privilege alert! Ding ding ding!), you can also fuck off. In fact, you can all fuck off and do something useful for the country.   

See the original piece here

Monday, 14 October 2013

Second "Racist" Red October Event Update

I have found a few more "responses" to the red October March by the black population with access to social media. Here they are: (and after reading them they really wonder what the march was about and say it has no merit?)

Black Sentiments Justifying the Red October March

I said that I was thinking of making this a regular feature here, so here it is again. From the keyboards of black South Africans from 2010 through to 2013 from various blogs, facebook pages, news sites and twitter feeds: (and even 3 threats against me personally - see if you can spot them :D)

7000 blacks killed by the government in 46 years is killing like flies? Then what do you call the death rate of whites now? 

Yup - studying towards a post graduate honors degree and this is what is deemed "educated"? OBE at its finest.

Anyone able to decipher this?
Lovely sentiment - but its not racist right?

Always blame the whites huh? Its a disease I tell you

Says the black man using the religion that whites introduced him to... 

Now the guy is a prophet? I highly doubt my God would have given a hate-filled warmonger to us a prophet. Maybe the reincarnation of Muhammed? 
Still no idea that the banks and mines were not built and fully operational when we arrived here... tsk tsk tsk

Only generational curse we're suffering from is the ANC, Juju and their ilk.

Direct twitter threats...

Again, using the religion they would know nothing about if not for the white man. Makes no sense to me.

Ah, the tolerance and respect for (white) women.

Lovely sentiment right?

He does know it wouldn't really work like that right?

Reported to the police. Bets on how long it takes for him to be investigate? I put my money on never

Of course - muslims are ignorant communists best friends

Can't you just feel the forgiveness the liberals tell us we should be grateful to the blacks for? 

Add caption

In response to an article detailing how education during Apartheid was better...
I'm still uncertain if its still stolen if I rent from a black man?

Unearned privileges? The only "unearned" privilege I have  is that in my late 20's store clerks no long find it necessary to watch me suspiciously or have security follow me when I enter a store - but that comes with age.

I wonder if he understands the fallout of using a nuke?

See? You just need to be black. No requirement to actually be South African or have first hand experience of Apartheid at all.

I love how he uses the law the whites brought here to justify his claims... double standards? 

I'd love to see the trade with Western countries then... or even with the Chinese without English. 

Sure... because the black cultures had so much advanced technical knowledge, economic models and a wealth of literature at their disposal... 

Clueless much? The US turns out enough food every year to solve world hunger. And without the US and Russian advances the Chinese would not be in space at all. If they could they would have been there in the 60's and 70's like the whites. And not to mention that whites landed on the moon - the Chinese only have a rover for it while whites are exploring Mars.

Because whites are soooo excited about celebrating a day dedicated to a misogynistic, warmongering cretin?  

Are they paying for my ticket?

Of course its a dream come true - get everything for free, never have to work and then blame the white man when the country implodes.

Kinda proved the point there didn't he?

I always pray for him: Psalms 109:8 - May his days be few;    may another take his place of leadership.