Search This Blog

Thursday, 26 September 2013

Race?..Blacks And Whites Are Not Even The Same Species

Very interesting opinion piece on MyNews24 today. I'm going to sit back and let Tor Asgardsson say it all (while I sit back and read the comments on the original article):

I once watched an old 50’s style advertisement that was created to help you men not put a foot wrong, when entertaining or being entertained by the young lady he was courting’ parents.
The young man was advised strictly to stay away from the subjects of “religion” and “politics” and discuss more pleasant current day events, such as a particular sports team had been doing well or the latest car to come off the production line.
Watching that it just reminded me what a sacred cow “Race” is in this country, this is something I find ludicrous.
People are so hell bent on “Race” that have overlooked recent discoveries that have been popping up which clearly define that, blacks and whites are not even the same species, never mind race.
The “Out of Africa” Theory is dead, all men are created equal is dead. The oldest recorded fossil record for now is still the 2.3-million year-old fossil Australopithecus africanus, nicknamed “Mrs Ples” found in Sterkfontein, but we Europeans have vast tracks of land we have yet begun to touch, layers and layers of ice that may show older fossils, but that is not the point. The point is Africans and Europeans, do not have a common ancestor.
Thanks largely in part to geneticists, the “Out of Africa” concept was popularized during the last two decades, yet it was never directly proven; however, for many specialists its appeal was undeniably convincing. It was also an all too “convenient excuse” for others (Afrocentrics being one of them) and so the scared cow of the “Out of Africa” Theory has been thrust upon us and taught in schools without their really being any hard scientific evidence for it.
But this is how “science” works, we have a “theory”, we explain and expand on it, provide “evidence” for it and it stays this way until it is further proven to be correct or it is proven to be incorrect.
Unlike Religion, Science seems to be able to say,”well, I was wrong”, I was wrong for these particular reasons and we move along, except when it come to Race.
Much like everything else, as we gather more data and devise new ways to look at data we come up with new hypothesis, over the last few years our understanding of DNA, mtDNA and haplogroups have increased.

We have more data to look at and more data to study thanks to projects such as “YSearch” which is “Y-DNA testing” and the “FTDNA Project”, projects where people from all around the world have given DNA samples along with their ethnicity, where they live as well as any family history as long back as they can remember.
Here is an abstract from, “Re-Examining the "Out of Africa" Theory and the Origin of Europeoids (Caucasoids) in Light of DNA Genealogy”
Seven thousand five hundred fifty-six (7556) haplotypes of 46 subclades in 17 major haplogroups were considered in terms of their base (ancestral) haplotypes and time spans to their common ancestors, for the purposes of designing of time-balanced haplogroup tree. It was found that African haplogroup A (originated 132,000 ± 12,000 years before present) is very remote time-wise from all other haplogroups, which have a separate common ancestor, named ß-haplogroup, and originated 64,000 ± 6000 ybp. It includes a family of Europeoid (Caucasoid) haplogroups from F through T that originated 58,000 ± 5000 ybp. A downstream common ancestor for haplogroup A and ß-haplogroup, coined the a-haplogroup emerged 160,000 ± 12,000 ybp. A territorial origin of haplogroups a- and ß-remains unknown; however, the most likely origin for each of them is a vast triangle stretched from Central Europe in the west through the Russian Plain to the east and to Levant to the south. Haplogroup B is descended from ß-haplogroup (and not from haplogroup A, from which it is very distant, and separated by as much as 123,000 years of “lat-eral” mutational evolution) likely migrated to Africa after 46,000 ybp. The finding that the Europeoid haplogroups did not descend from “African” haplogroups A or B is supported by the fact that bearers of the Europeoid haplogroups, as well as all non-African haplogroups do not carry either SNPs M91, P97, M31, P82, M23, M114, P262, M32, M59, P289, P291, P102, M13, M171, M118 (haplogroup A and its subclades SNPs) or M60, M181, P90 (haplogroup B), as it was shown recently in “Walk through Y” FTDNA Project (the reference is incorporated therein) on several hundred people from various haplogroups.
So if you were unable to follow the abstract above, I shall make it easy for you, the propaganda you are being fed about all man originating in Africa is incorrect, more and more studies are bringing this to light as I mentioned above.
Africans and Europeans are different species, this goes further than just a colour issue, but it is at the core of who we are.

It’s time to stop spreading “false multiculturalism” and start really celebrating our diversity, this can only begin when we recogonise we are not the same, we never have been and we never will be.

1. Re-Examining the "Out of Africa" Theory and the Origin of Europeoids (Caucasoids) in Light of DNA Genealogy

2. Genetic evidence for archaic admixture in Africa

3. Atala, is a website dedicated to articles relating to prehistory, and more specifically Marie Cachet’s unique theory about the Neanderthal and Homo Sapiens hybridization.


  1. 'Unlike Religion, Science seems to be able to say,”well, I was wrong”" NO...religion isnt wrong, never has been. every time science tries to prove it wrong, they prove it right. the global warming hoax its yet another part of science where "political correctness" is destroying science's creditability.

    now on to the article, i have been saying the "out of africa" theory is a load of crap for a VERY long time. if you know anything about Darwinism and his theories you would immediately frown upon the "OOA" theory and would be forced to ask even more uncomfortable questions such as, if africans were around for so damn long, why did they make NO impact on history at all? what have Africans accomplished in the last 50,000 years? no written language of their own, no math, science, art, philosophy, or inventions at all until they were removed from africa and brought to a civilized area of the world like the Americas and or Europe, well other than slavery...

    1. I agree with you 100% on both points. The article was not mine but was written by a reader of the site. I was more interested in the comments section to be honest with you.

  2. This is the most ignorant article I have ever read, disguised with what seems science. First of all, you speak in radical terms, as if there where only two people in the entire planet: white people and black people, when that is totally false, as you have many halogroups with many different other words, MANY types of light-skinned and dark-skinned people. And do you even know what a species is, buddy???? So black people are lions, for example, and white people are crocordiles??? What the fuck??? Here, I'll help you: "A species is often defined as the largest group of organisms where two hybrids are capable of reproducing fertile offspring, typically using sexual reproduction". Can a white woman reproduce fertil offspring with a black man? Can a black woman have babies with a white guy? The answer is YES in both cases. So, black people and white people ARE IN FACT MEMBERS OF THE SAME SPECIES, IDIOT.

    1. Well seems like someone is adverse o actually reading a full article... I have never claimed this work as my own and did not once say that I agreed with its contents not having the academic ability in these fields to be able to research for myself.

      I said that I was interested in reading the comments on the original article (which I linked to)... And I see that you can use Google to find a definition - good for you.

    2. I have always questioned how the Egyptians could have been this "master race", building and constructing monuments that we, with our modern technology, can not even dream of doing...and then suddenly, turn into dumb camel humping dunecoons...

    3. So have I Anton... Its a very interesting question... devolution in Africa? Looks like it.