Search This Blog

Friday, 27 September 2013

How To Make Schools Suit Liberal Agendas

I was reading an article when a slideshow at the bottom caught my eye. Entitled "Weird things banned at Schools" had me shaking my head in utter despair.

Here are my top 5 things that liberals have pushed for the banning of so that children don't have their feelings hurt:

5. Best Friends - Schools in the UK have discouraged kids from forming strong bonds with other individual children and instead encourage them to form groups. This is simply to make sure that an entire generation of kids grows up without knowing how to deal with conflict because we would never ever want kids to have to know deal with hurt feelings after a fight with a friend. What's next? We encourage kids to have multiple girlfriends/boyfriends so that they don't have to deal with the pain of rejection?

4. No Milk - Vegans are coming out of the woodwork to stop kids in the US from enjoying a healthy and traditional part of school lunches - milk. Hiding behind statements that milk is “…high in sugar, high in fat and high in animal protein that is harmful to, rather than protective of, bone health.” we have been informed that KIDS can get their calcium from these alternative sources: "beans, green leafy vegetables (e.g., broccoli, kale, collard greens), tofu products, breads and cereals. Additionally, a wide variety of non-dairy, calcium-fortified beverages is available today including soy milk, rice milk and fruit juice, all of which provide greater health and nutritional benefits compared with dairy milk.” No mention is made of the fact that kids simply will not eat those foods nor is there any mention of the fact that most of those "non-dairy, calcium-fortified beverages" have so many other additives in them that they are basically toxic (and they taste like crap too). Why don't the veggie-eaters come out and say what they really mean? We want to force all people to live the same kind of soulless and boring lives that we do free from all kind of meat influence. Starting with milk they can then move on to all other meat.

3. Christmas - A scholl in Sydney has banned all references to Santa, Carols and Christianity (I notice that Islam, Hinduism and Judaism are perfectly acceptable while Christianity is divisive). The school's principal said that it was possibly an attempt to address the fact that the teacher has kids from different religious backgrounds in her class.

2. Various Words - The New York Department of Education has banned words like dinosaur (it may bring up evolution), Halloween (might refer to paganism),  birthday (because Jehovah Witnesses don'e celebrate them). Not even the word "poverty" is allowed because it reminds kids of "wealth" and this might hurt poor kids. Department officials told FOX News Nation that the mandates are simply meant to be sensitive to a diverse student body. How politically correct do we really have to get? This is getting beyond a joke now.

...and my ultimate favourite...

1. Competition - A school in Connecticut has banned all recess activities which may lead to competition between the kids. So in effect they are telling kids that you should never want to be a winner and should never engage in any kind of activity which may result in someone having their feelings hurt because they were not as good as the next kid. I have to wonder what kind of a shock these kids will be having as soon as they get into the real world and find out that not everyone gets a prize for participation and that survival is a dog-eat-dog game? 

Thursday, 26 September 2013

Race?..Blacks And Whites Are Not Even The Same Species

Very interesting opinion piece on MyNews24 today. I'm going to sit back and let Tor Asgardsson say it all (while I sit back and read the comments on the original article):

I once watched an old 50’s style advertisement that was created to help you men not put a foot wrong, when entertaining or being entertained by the young lady he was courting’ parents.
The young man was advised strictly to stay away from the subjects of “religion” and “politics” and discuss more pleasant current day events, such as a particular sports team had been doing well or the latest car to come off the production line.
Watching that it just reminded me what a sacred cow “Race” is in this country, this is something I find ludicrous.
People are so hell bent on “Race” that have overlooked recent discoveries that have been popping up which clearly define that, blacks and whites are not even the same species, never mind race.
The “Out of Africa” Theory is dead, all men are created equal is dead. The oldest recorded fossil record for now is still the 2.3-million year-old fossil Australopithecus africanus, nicknamed “Mrs Ples” found in Sterkfontein, but we Europeans have vast tracks of land we have yet begun to touch, layers and layers of ice that may show older fossils, but that is not the point. The point is Africans and Europeans, do not have a common ancestor.
Thanks largely in part to geneticists, the “Out of Africa” concept was popularized during the last two decades, yet it was never directly proven; however, for many specialists its appeal was undeniably convincing. It was also an all too “convenient excuse” for others (Afrocentrics being one of them) and so the scared cow of the “Out of Africa” Theory has been thrust upon us and taught in schools without their really being any hard scientific evidence for it.
But this is how “science” works, we have a “theory”, we explain and expand on it, provide “evidence” for it and it stays this way until it is further proven to be correct or it is proven to be incorrect.
Unlike Religion, Science seems to be able to say,”well, I was wrong”, I was wrong for these particular reasons and we move along, except when it come to Race.
Much like everything else, as we gather more data and devise new ways to look at data we come up with new hypothesis, over the last few years our understanding of DNA, mtDNA and haplogroups have increased.

We have more data to look at and more data to study thanks to projects such as “YSearch” which is “Y-DNA testing” and the “FTDNA Project”, projects where people from all around the world have given DNA samples along with their ethnicity, where they live as well as any family history as long back as they can remember.
Here is an abstract from, “Re-Examining the "Out of Africa" Theory and the Origin of Europeoids (Caucasoids) in Light of DNA Genealogy”
Seven thousand five hundred fifty-six (7556) haplotypes of 46 subclades in 17 major haplogroups were considered in terms of their base (ancestral) haplotypes and time spans to their common ancestors, for the purposes of designing of time-balanced haplogroup tree. It was found that African haplogroup A (originated 132,000 ± 12,000 years before present) is very remote time-wise from all other haplogroups, which have a separate common ancestor, named ß-haplogroup, and originated 64,000 ± 6000 ybp. It includes a family of Europeoid (Caucasoid) haplogroups from F through T that originated 58,000 ± 5000 ybp. A downstream common ancestor for haplogroup A and ß-haplogroup, coined the a-haplogroup emerged 160,000 ± 12,000 ybp. A territorial origin of haplogroups a- and ß-remains unknown; however, the most likely origin for each of them is a vast triangle stretched from Central Europe in the west through the Russian Plain to the east and to Levant to the south. Haplogroup B is descended from ß-haplogroup (and not from haplogroup A, from which it is very distant, and separated by as much as 123,000 years of “lat-eral” mutational evolution) likely migrated to Africa after 46,000 ybp. The finding that the Europeoid haplogroups did not descend from “African” haplogroups A or B is supported by the fact that bearers of the Europeoid haplogroups, as well as all non-African haplogroups do not carry either SNPs M91, P97, M31, P82, M23, M114, P262, M32, M59, P289, P291, P102, M13, M171, M118 (haplogroup A and its subclades SNPs) or M60, M181, P90 (haplogroup B), as it was shown recently in “Walk through Y” FTDNA Project (the reference is incorporated therein) on several hundred people from various haplogroups.
So if you were unable to follow the abstract above, I shall make it easy for you, the propaganda you are being fed about all man originating in Africa is incorrect, more and more studies are bringing this to light as I mentioned above.
Africans and Europeans are different species, this goes further than just a colour issue, but it is at the core of who we are.

It’s time to stop spreading “false multiculturalism” and start really celebrating our diversity, this can only begin when we recogonise we are not the same, we never have been and we never will be.

1. Re-Examining the "Out of Africa" Theory and the Origin of Europeoids (Caucasoids) in Light of DNA Genealogy

2. Genetic evidence for archaic admixture in Africa

3. Atala, is a website dedicated to articles relating to prehistory, and more specifically Marie Cachet’s unique theory about the Neanderthal and Homo Sapiens hybridization.

One For The (Liberal) Ages

I really have to wonder which side the liberals will place themselves on in this heavyweight battle that seems to be unfolding - the feminists or the transgendered? Where will the liberals run to when the people that are locking horns are the very same people that they openly support over the normal and God ordained pairing of heterosexual men and women? 

I think its hilarious and it was bound to happen - two groups on the liberal support list are now squaring up against each other on the grounds of, wait for it..... discrimination. There is of course no natural enemy for the liberals to gang up on here because the right thinking conservatives would already have known that this was bound to happen and stayed well clear of it. (Although who wants to take bets that this will still be blamed on the white man and patriarchy?)

Henry Makow runs a site that I was once extremely anti. Yes, I am ashamed to say that I too was once an atheist feminist liberal who found his articles to be exceptionally offensive and entirely "unfair" and a direct example of his utter misogynistic beliefs and firmly believed that he needed to be taken down a peg or two. Thank the good Lord above that I was delivered from my madness. The thing we have to worry about now is when this kind of thing will hit us here in SA...

She-Males Accuse Lesbians of "Transphobia"

September 25, 2013

Lesbians regard transgendered males as female impersonators and won't let them come to their conferences or have sex with them. 

by Reality - Publication of Real Women of Canada (Sept.) 

Feminists and lesbians have been shocked and dismayed by the intrusion into their "space" by transgendered males.

Those promoting protection for transgenders would have us believe that, if only those who reject their natural sex were legally recognized, they would lead fully satisfying and fulfilling lives. 

That is, once churches, hospitals, schools and clinics plus all public locker rooms and restrooms were required to protect those trying to change their gender, with fines for anyone who dares to be so foolhardy as to make even a negative comment about them or create a "distinction" regarding cross-dressers, etc., transgenders would then be content.

But maybe not. There appears to be some trouble in transgender land. The trouble is that lesbians don't regard transgendered males as truly women and refuse to have sex with them. 

Lesbians take offense, claiming that transgendered males are trying to force themselves on them.They regard transgendered males as female impersonators. The horror of it!

Transgenders, in turn, view lesbians as downright discriminatory just because they may still, in some case, have retained their male genitals.

Planned Parenthood of Toronto, ever willing to encourage sexual activity wherever and with whomever, held a seminar in Toronto on March 12, 2012, open only to transgendered males. 

The purpose of the seminar was to help these transgendering individuals deal with the problem of lesbians refusing to have sex with them.The seminar was called,"The Cotton Ceiling", the cotton referring to lesbians' customary wearing of cotton underwear.


Feminists have been shocked and dismayed by the intrusion into their "space" by transgendered males, whether in lesbian bars, record companies, spas, festivals and book stores. They regard this as the ultimate in male power-tripping.

Consequently, in Toronto, July 5 to 7, 2013, a feminist group, Radfem Rise Up! organized a three day conference for "womyn-born womyn" at which, according to the transgendered males, there was prominently featured, a number of transphobic speakers.

In response, the transgenders inundated the feminist group's twitter account with adverse comments and planned a physical protest as well. The protest was thwarted by the conference moving to a secret location only hours before it was scheduled to start.

The transgenders then complained to Toronto MPP Cheri DiNovo,left, whose bill, "Toby's Act", became law in 2012. It added protection of "gender identity" and "gender expression" to the Ontario Human Rights Code.

Ms. DiNovo declared that same-sex gatherings [i.e. women only, men only] were illegal under Toby's Act and she appealed to the Ontario Human Rights Commission to back up her position legally. 

If successful, her interpretation of the Act means that any assembly of females, on whatever subject, such as reproductive rights meetings, Islamic faith gatherings, or lesbian support groups, etc. will be prohibited under her bill. This would also apply to any assembly of males, as well. 

Somehow one can believe that this was an unintended consequence of the Act!

The Ontario Human Rights Commission's response to Ms. DiNovo's complaint was that it was currently "monitoring" the situation, but that the Commission didn't have a definitive legal position at present since it was still in the process of defining its policy on "gender identity".

Will the Commission untie this "Gordian Knot" by the application of common sense?

 Naw! As specialists in "hurt feelings", "distress", "alarm", "insults" and "toxic environments", they wouldn't know how to do it. 

Wednesday, 4 September 2013

ANC Under Fire - Literally

Well, looks like the ANC are finally getting back a little of their own medicine. It seems that someone has taken the fight directly to their headquarters Loot Freely Luthuli House where a suspicious fire was started last night in the reception area. 

The ANC naturally says that the arson attempt was politically motivated and was an attempt to destabilise the party ahead of next years general elections. Political it may be, but I wonder if they have even stopped and thought one tiny, minuscule moment that it was a message being sent to them by people tired of them watching our country go up in flames and actively egging it on? Or how about the idea that the ANC staged the fire themselves as a means of attacking other political parties that are seen as threatening their majority?

Should be an interesting saga to keep tabs on...

Luthuli House arson attack political - ANC

2013-09-04 07:28
Johannesburg - The ANC believes that a fire which broke out in its Luthuli House headquarters in downtown Johannesburg on Tuesday evening was an arson attack and was political.
ANC spokesperson Jackson Mthembu told Beeld that the incident was a "political attack" aimed at destabilising the party in the run-up to next year's general elections.
He added that the ANC viewed the incident in a serious light.
A bottle containing an unknown chemical exploded in the reception area of Luthuli House at about 18:00 on Tuesday, Sapa reported. Security guards managed to contain the fire, which damaged a couch as well as the floor and ceiling. The building was evacuated.
According to Beeld, a number of top ANC members were in a meeting on the 11th floor of the building at the time, including Mthembu and Public Service and Administration Minister Lindiwe Sisulu. Justice Minister Jeff Radebe left the building before the fire. Earlier on Tuesday, ANC deputy president Cyril Ramaphosa and ANC secretary general Gwede Mantashe had met with a Chinese delegation.
Mthembu told The Star that he went to the reception area after the fire had been extinguished. "There was a lot of smoke and a smell of something chemical," he said.
According to The Star, police sniffer dogs were sent in to search for any more devices. Forensic and ballistic experts were also at the scene, and the evidence, along with CCTV footage, will be studied.

Security at the building is normally tight. A fire broke out on the 6th floor in 2005, and in 2008 a man tried to set a security scanner alight, while there was also a bomb threat later that year, The Star reported.

Feminist Hypocrisy

After a rather protracted Twitter discussion (follow me at @QHGossipGirl) with a lovely and ignorant feminist who feels that poor little Miley Cyrus has been hard done by by the world at large for criticism levelled against her disgusting behaviour at the VMA's recently, I have decided that its now time to post a few meme's detailing feminist hypocrisy. Naturally I have been told that I should not judge Miley for her slutty behaviour and yet told that women should have equal rights? I just have to ask, would equal rights then not extend to my being able to call her out on her behaviour that glorifies sex in the realm of childhood if she is allowed to prance around barely dressed in full view of millions of people while simulating sex? Or do we only have equal rights when we agree with the feminists?

Monday, 2 September 2013

Judicial Transformation?

A little while ago there was a little bit of a furore surrounding the racist murmurings of one of Zuma's lackeys in the Constitutional Court  -Chief "Justice" Mogoeng Mogoeng who had decided that it was time that the judiciary waged war against white men. All this was naturally said in support of "transformation". There was, naturally, an outcry from the white male section of the legal profession who were effectively being actively overlooked for positions on the bench on the sole basis of their skin colour (and the posts given to black candidates instead).

Advocate Paul Hoffman took up the heavy mantle of laying a complaint with the Judicial Service Commission against the outright hate speech uttered during Mogoeng's speech at a the Advocates for Transformation's Annual General Meeting on 6 July. Of course there was the usual opposition to this complaint by the usual sources and even some unexpected ones.

So, of course, we have all been treated to lengthy expose's on why the Chief Justice was correct and why we so desperately need "transformation" even at the expense of experience. But it would seem that we have to have transformation even at the expense of respect for the law at all. You see, the Magistrates Courts have already been highly "transformed" (read: white magistrates kicked out and replaced with unqualified black magistrates - who also go on strike I may add, something that NEVER happened during Apartheid but I digress).

And as a result of this lovely transformation of our courts, not only have we had failure after failure after failure by the courts to properly prosecute and convict criminals but have also seen distinct failures of the justice system where criminals are let off the hook with inadequate sentences. But that is not the concern here - the concern that I wish to bring to the attention of my international readers is the fact that this year alone there have been 222 reports of Magistrates who have been implicated offences including sexual harassment, drunken driving, assault, gambling, fraud, theft and even murder. Yes folks, these are the people who have been tasked with upholding our justice system. And people wonder why we have no respect for the courts or the legal system anymore. 

Well this is the reason - the inexperienced, uneducated, ill-equipped, unqualified and criminal magistrates that have been forced onto the bench ahead of better qualified and more experienced legal professionals in the name of "transformation". One has to wonder if this isn't exactly what the ANC was hoping for? We have already been advised that the SAPS will ADMIT to the fact that 1448 police officers have criminal records (only God knows how many more they have covered up - even the high ranking officer who was actually appointed as Gauteng Police Commissioner has pending criminal investigations and charges).

All I have to say folks is that this is the South Africa that we were warned about by Verwoerd, Botha and the like - but no one took heed and what we are left with is a corrupt system which favours the criminals and is designed to slowly eliminate the white population of South Africa - but only after looting all of the wealth created by those they are killing. I hope the liberals who advocated for the end of Apartheid are happy with what they have caused.

Magistrates 'drunks, thieves and killers'

2013-09-01 11:52
Pretoria - Magistrates around the country are under fire for breaking the law - with four having been kicked out this year alone - as the credibility of courts suffers.

The Sunday Times reported that some magistrates have been suspended and, in some instances, removed from office for offences including sexual harassment, drunken driving, assault, gambling, fraud, theft and even murder.

According to the report, the seriousness of some of the cases has raised doubts about the magistrates’ ability to mete out justice. Statistics provided by the Magistrates’ Commission last week show that 258 complaints were made against magistrates last year, whereas 222 complaints have been received this year so far. These have resulted in 28 formal investigations.

Four magistrates have been removed from office this year, and one has been suspended. One magistrate was suspended last year. Some magistrates have also been accused of serious misconduct and in some cases they were found guilty.

Reports to parliament reveal numerous delays in finalising investigations against magistrates. In 2011, parliament’s justice portfolio committee complained of delays in the case of Mxolisi Matereke, a magistrate convicted of murder and assault. It took the commission more than three years after his first court appearance to charge him with misconduct.